What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
SHOT Show 2010
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Steve C" data-source="post: 1712784" data-attributes="member: 56622"><p>Rick,</p><p></p><p>That's OK looking at it, yes the post could have been interpreted as you did. You are probably right in that ZR has not seriously eroded any body's business. I am pretty sure Charles realized the upstream dive into the current he took. But he took it. As far as I'm concerned, good for him. As it stands now ZR is now the "best bang for the buck sub $500 binocular". Will they stay there? I don't know, don't have a clue. </p><p></p><p>I sure hope you have more information in your comment... "<em>now that bigger players are bringing in sub-$500 full featured binos. No clout in now that bigger players are bringing in sub-$500 full featured binos. </em>" </p><p></p><p>The Nikon Monarch X seems to be one big name attempt that has no chance in a side by side against the ZR ED. Nikon has to have something more up their sleeve than that. I think there is likely more serious competition upcoming from their new "rumored" Monarch with dielectric coating and better glass. The first Monarch was a classic, and if they add an extra degree in the fov, I'm all for it, as the new one could be a classic too.</p><p></p><p>The Leupold Northfork is a good binocular, better than the Monarch X, but still no ZR ED.</p><p></p><p>From my slight knowledge from the optics contacts I do have, is that the ZR ED "generic binocular" was passed on by a couple of "name brand players". I give credit to ZR for getting the name brand guys off their backside. Nikon, for example sat on their backside for over a decade with the Monarch. If anything is established, it is there is a demand for that optics/price niche and I think it may re arrange the optics field. Where ZR is a few years from now, who knows? Looks like Pentax might have dropped the ball for a fatal interlude. I hope not.</p><p></p><p>So you are undoubtedly correct in that there is an upcoming wave of introductions. Blessed be the name of the game. I like competition. Meanwhile you will see no obnoxious 8-P slurping in anticipation of some body's death from me.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Steve C, post: 1712784, member: 56622"] Rick, That's OK looking at it, yes the post could have been interpreted as you did. You are probably right in that ZR has not seriously eroded any body's business. I am pretty sure Charles realized the upstream dive into the current he took. But he took it. As far as I'm concerned, good for him. As it stands now ZR is now the "best bang for the buck sub $500 binocular". Will they stay there? I don't know, don't have a clue. I sure hope you have more information in your comment... "[I]now that bigger players are bringing in sub-$500 full featured binos. No clout in now that bigger players are bringing in sub-$500 full featured binos. [/I]" The Nikon Monarch X seems to be one big name attempt that has no chance in a side by side against the ZR ED. Nikon has to have something more up their sleeve than that. I think there is likely more serious competition upcoming from their new "rumored" Monarch with dielectric coating and better glass. The first Monarch was a classic, and if they add an extra degree in the fov, I'm all for it, as the new one could be a classic too. The Leupold Northfork is a good binocular, better than the Monarch X, but still no ZR ED. From my slight knowledge from the optics contacts I do have, is that the ZR ED "generic binocular" was passed on by a couple of "name brand players". I give credit to ZR for getting the name brand guys off their backside. Nikon, for example sat on their backside for over a decade with the Monarch. If anything is established, it is there is a demand for that optics/price niche and I think it may re arrange the optics field. Where ZR is a few years from now, who knows? Looks like Pentax might have dropped the ball for a fatal interlude. I hope not. So you are undoubtedly correct in that there is an upcoming wave of introductions. Blessed be the name of the game. I like competition. Meanwhile you will see no obnoxious 8-P slurping in anticipation of some body's death from me. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
SHOT Show 2010
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top