What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Birding
Birds & Birding
Should you tick "heard only" birds?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Alexjh1" data-source="post: 3523806" data-attributes="member: 85555"><p>I tend to keep my own "heard only" list for my own personal reference but not count it in my proper listing capacity. There are a few birds which have distinctive calls which I've been happy to leave on there for a while certain in their identity (Savi's warbler and Woodlark for instance) but for me the real problem happens when I'm birding abroad and I hear something that I know has to be a new species, but being a much more visual person than sound based I can't actually memorise it unless I'd prepared for possible calls beforehand, I don't think I would get away with "some kind of owl in Kuala Lumpur" for instance.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Alexjh1, post: 3523806, member: 85555"] I tend to keep my own "heard only" list for my own personal reference but not count it in my proper listing capacity. There are a few birds which have distinctive calls which I've been happy to leave on there for a while certain in their identity (Savi's warbler and Woodlark for instance) but for me the real problem happens when I'm birding abroad and I hear something that I know has to be a new species, but being a much more visual person than sound based I can't actually memorise it unless I'd prepared for possible calls beforehand, I don't think I would get away with "some kind of owl in Kuala Lumpur" for instance. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Birding
Birds & Birding
Should you tick "heard only" birds?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top