What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Birding
Birds & Birding
Should you tick "heard only" birds?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Andy Adcock" data-source="post: 3523933" data-attributes="member: 31710"><p>In my reports I indicate HO's but that doesn't mean I count them on my life list, I don't, it's simply a record. People indicate HO for various reasons, often surveys do it as the only time effective way to monitor species.</p><p></p><p>As mentioned above, bird mimicry is an issue, I chased African Emerald Cuckoo, which I still haven't seen, all over in South Africa only to find Chorister Robin Chat at the end of every chase. If it wasn't for the fact that I need the Cuckoo and so chased it, there would be several HO's for the species on my report which would be wrong and create a false impression of the abundance of that species.</p><p></p><p>Several World listers include HO's, it's up to them, it's nowhere near as pleasurable or challenging as tracking down a bird and then seeing it but for listing purposes, it has to be a level playing field. I don't think HO's should count if you intend to be competitive, what you do with your list privately is up to you. </p><p></p><p>I've been within 3 feet of Blue-naped Pitta which was responding to tape but haven't ticked it as we didn't see it and that one hurt!</p><p></p><p></p><p>A</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Andy Adcock, post: 3523933, member: 31710"] In my reports I indicate HO's but that doesn't mean I count them on my life list, I don't, it's simply a record. People indicate HO for various reasons, often surveys do it as the only time effective way to monitor species. As mentioned above, bird mimicry is an issue, I chased African Emerald Cuckoo, which I still haven't seen, all over in South Africa only to find Chorister Robin Chat at the end of every chase. If it wasn't for the fact that I need the Cuckoo and so chased it, there would be several HO's for the species on my report which would be wrong and create a false impression of the abundance of that species. Several World listers include HO's, it's up to them, it's nowhere near as pleasurable or challenging as tracking down a bird and then seeing it but for listing purposes, it has to be a level playing field. I don't think HO's should count if you intend to be competitive, what you do with your list privately is up to you. I've been within 3 feet of Blue-naped Pitta which was responding to tape but haven't ticked it as we didn't see it and that one hurt! A [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Birding
Birds & Birding
Should you tick "heard only" birds?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top