What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Birding
Birds & Birding
Should you tick "heard only" birds?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Andy Adcock" data-source="post: 3524793" data-attributes="member: 31710"><p>I'm a great believer that it's a natural gift akin to being musical.</p><p></p><p>My wife who is far less experienced a birder, is far better than me at calls, I don't retain them at all. I can sit listening to a recording for an hour, five minutes after I stop listening I won't remember it but my wife does.</p><p></p><p>If you don't see the bird there is every chance depending on how notable the call is and how good a birder you are, that an error will be made. My post re mimicry above should be a warning to all. I just find the whole ticking on call a bit unsatisfactory. If you're a competitive lister, you should note on your list if you publish it, how many species are HO's. Jon Hornbuckle (World's top lister) makes sure that it's clear that his published list is all seen birds, others don't and I think that it makes an unfair comparison. One of his close rivals in known for not even trying to see nightbirds and sometimes won't even leave the vehicle if he can hear a bird from his seat, I personally see no point whatever in this approach.</p><p></p><p></p><p>A</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Andy Adcock, post: 3524793, member: 31710"] I'm a great believer that it's a natural gift akin to being musical. My wife who is far less experienced a birder, is far better than me at calls, I don't retain them at all. I can sit listening to a recording for an hour, five minutes after I stop listening I won't remember it but my wife does. If you don't see the bird there is every chance depending on how notable the call is and how good a birder you are, that an error will be made. My post re mimicry above should be a warning to all. I just find the whole ticking on call a bit unsatisfactory. If you're a competitive lister, you should note on your list if you publish it, how many species are HO's. Jon Hornbuckle (World's top lister) makes sure that it's clear that his published list is all seen birds, others don't and I think that it makes an unfair comparison. One of his close rivals in known for not even trying to see nightbirds and sometimes won't even leave the vehicle if he can hear a bird from his seat, I personally see no point whatever in this approach. A [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Birding
Birds & Birding
Should you tick "heard only" birds?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top