What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Spotting Scopes & tripod/heads
Shoulder pods update?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Richard Scott" data-source="post: 524583" data-attributes="member: 17964"><p>I've been using a cullmann shoulder-pod for over 15 years. Its great for quickly getting onto a bird and getting a quick ID, but no good for prolonged viewing. I've used it with 50-60mm scopes with a wide-angle lens, but when I had a Kowa TSN3 77mm it was a bit too cumbersome, so I switched to using a manfrotto monopod. I've now got a Leica APO62 angled scope and that's fine on the shoulder-pod. Some people might say that straight scopes are easier than angled scopes when using shoulder-pods, but I've used both and don't have any problems with angled.</p><p></p><p>When used as a mini-tripod, its OK but I always keep hold of it because I don't trust its stability. The only damage mine has sustained is to the plastic covering on the locking nut. As Tim points out its ideally suited to situations when its not necessary or suitable to carry a tripod.</p><p></p><p>Rich.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Richard Scott, post: 524583, member: 17964"] I've been using a cullmann shoulder-pod for over 15 years. Its great for quickly getting onto a bird and getting a quick ID, but no good for prolonged viewing. I've used it with 50-60mm scopes with a wide-angle lens, but when I had a Kowa TSN3 77mm it was a bit too cumbersome, so I switched to using a manfrotto monopod. I've now got a Leica APO62 angled scope and that's fine on the shoulder-pod. Some people might say that straight scopes are easier than angled scopes when using shoulder-pods, but I've used both and don't have any problems with angled. When used as a mini-tripod, its OK but I always keep hold of it because I don't trust its stability. The only damage mine has sustained is to the plastic covering on the locking nut. As Tim points out its ideally suited to situations when its not necessary or suitable to carry a tripod. Rich. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Spotting Scopes & tripod/heads
Shoulder pods update?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top