What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Spotting Scopes & tripod/heads
Shoulder Stock for 50 mm Scope - 3D printed
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Hauksen" data-source="post: 3589458" data-attributes="member: 142861"><p>Hi everyone,</p><p></p><p>In the recent thread "Straight or Angled", Etudiant mentioned the advantages of using a shoulder stock to stabilize the view through a hand-held scope.</p><p></p><p><a href="http://www.birdforum.net/showthread.php?t=346479" target="_blank">http://www.birdforum.net/showthread.php?t=346479</a></p><p></p><p>Intrigued by the idea and aided by Sancho's feedback on his experience with commerically available shoulder stocks, I designed and printed parts for a simple shoulder stock to use with my Nikon ED50. As I have both a straight and an angled body, I thought this would be interesting to try out.</p><p></p><p>Here is what it looks like:</p><p></p><p>[ATTACH]633058[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p>To keep cost down, the length of the stock consists of a beech staff of 25 mm diameter and, presently, 220 mm length. </p><p></p><p>Length adjustment is by means of a hacksaw <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /> </p><p></p><p>I had planned to use PVC tubing, but as the hardware store didn't have it available in 25 mm, I went for wood, which looks nicer anyhow. It's a bit heavier though. The printed parts fit over the beech staff so well that it proved unnecessary to secure them with screws as originally intended.</p><p></p><p>So far, I've tried the shoulder stock with my ...</p><p></p><p>- Panasonic FZ1000 bridge camera with red dot/reflex sight,</p><p>- Nikon ED50A (angled),</p><p>- Nikon ED50 (straight).</p><p></p><p>For the camera in conjunction with a reflex sight, the shoulder stock is great. While I didn't have any birds around for testing, the well-defined position of the camera clearly makes it (yet) easier to use the reflex sight for tracking.</p><p></p><p>With the Nikon ED50A, the shoulder stock gives a very nicely stable view, from a fairly relaxed position. It's not tripod-stable obviously, but a clear improvment over using it hand-held. With the zoom eye-piece, I'm comfortable at 30x magnification, but I probably wouldn't regularly go to 40x.</p><p></p><p>To my suprise, the shoulder stock does not feel as good with the straight ED50 as it does with the angled one. This is owed to the fact that one has to raise the arms higher to hold the scope, which isn't nearly as relaxed, and the steadiness of the image accordingly is not as good as with the angled ED50. The hand on the focus dial also has to be held a little higher, adding to the feeling of subtle inconvenience.</p><p></p><p>(All these tests were made from the comfort of my living room while it was pouring outside, so I still have to test the shoulder stock in the field.)</p><p></p><p>Regards,</p><p></p><p>Henning</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Hauksen, post: 3589458, member: 142861"] Hi everyone, In the recent thread "Straight or Angled", Etudiant mentioned the advantages of using a shoulder stock to stabilize the view through a hand-held scope. [url]http://www.birdforum.net/showthread.php?t=346479[/url] Intrigued by the idea and aided by Sancho's feedback on his experience with commerically available shoulder stocks, I designed and printed parts for a simple shoulder stock to use with my Nikon ED50. As I have both a straight and an angled body, I thought this would be interesting to try out. Here is what it looks like: [ATTACH]633058._xfImport[/ATTACH] To keep cost down, the length of the stock consists of a beech staff of 25 mm diameter and, presently, 220 mm length. Length adjustment is by means of a hacksaw :-) I had planned to use PVC tubing, but as the hardware store didn't have it available in 25 mm, I went for wood, which looks nicer anyhow. It's a bit heavier though. The printed parts fit over the beech staff so well that it proved unnecessary to secure them with screws as originally intended. So far, I've tried the shoulder stock with my ... - Panasonic FZ1000 bridge camera with red dot/reflex sight, - Nikon ED50A (angled), - Nikon ED50 (straight). For the camera in conjunction with a reflex sight, the shoulder stock is great. While I didn't have any birds around for testing, the well-defined position of the camera clearly makes it (yet) easier to use the reflex sight for tracking. With the Nikon ED50A, the shoulder stock gives a very nicely stable view, from a fairly relaxed position. It's not tripod-stable obviously, but a clear improvment over using it hand-held. With the zoom eye-piece, I'm comfortable at 30x magnification, but I probably wouldn't regularly go to 40x. To my suprise, the shoulder stock does not feel as good with the straight ED50 as it does with the angled one. This is owed to the fact that one has to raise the arms higher to hold the scope, which isn't nearly as relaxed, and the steadiness of the image accordingly is not as good as with the angled ED50. The hand on the focus dial also has to be held a little higher, adding to the feeling of subtle inconvenience. (All these tests were made from the comfort of my living room while it was pouring outside, so I still have to test the shoulder stock in the field.) Regards, Henning [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Spotting Scopes & tripod/heads
Shoulder Stock for 50 mm Scope - 3D printed
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top