What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Birding
Birds & Birding
Shouldn't the RSPB mainly be to conserve birds and not other wildlife?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Alcina" data-source="post: 3245839" data-attributes="member: 11932"><p>You should be thankful. Mostly the RSPB obtains reserves by taking over ones which have been created by the hard work of local volunteers, or by local authorities, and ruining them. They then decide to 'manage' them (wrecking water levels, destroying bushes) and turn them into amusement parks so that lots of people bring screaming kids to play. They pull down hides and replace them with glass 'visibles' which frighten all the birds away, bulldoze holes in sea walls which were built by hundreds of hours of hard manual labour by volunteers, the list goes on. They also fail to understand that in summer the birder's day is nearly over by 10am, which is their standard opening hour. This says everything you need to know; they think of their reserves as tourist attractions, not places for birders.</p><p></p><p>There are a few exceptions, where the RSPB has created really great reserves from scratch (like Lakenheath), and occasions when they do open reserves early for birders, which I am grateful for, and I continue to be member because of these.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Alcina, post: 3245839, member: 11932"] You should be thankful. Mostly the RSPB obtains reserves by taking over ones which have been created by the hard work of local volunteers, or by local authorities, and ruining them. They then decide to 'manage' them (wrecking water levels, destroying bushes) and turn them into amusement parks so that lots of people bring screaming kids to play. They pull down hides and replace them with glass 'visibles' which frighten all the birds away, bulldoze holes in sea walls which were built by hundreds of hours of hard manual labour by volunteers, the list goes on. They also fail to understand that in summer the birder's day is nearly over by 10am, which is their standard opening hour. This says everything you need to know; they think of their reserves as tourist attractions, not places for birders. There are a few exceptions, where the RSPB has created really great reserves from scratch (like Lakenheath), and occasions when they do open reserves early for birders, which I am grateful for, and I continue to be member because of these. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Birding
Birds & Birding
Shouldn't the RSPB mainly be to conserve birds and not other wildlife?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top