What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Birding
Birds & Birding
Shouldn't the RSPB mainly be to conserve birds and not other wildlife?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Farnboro John" data-source="post: 3246367" data-attributes="member: 36432"><p>You live in Britain but don't acknowledge that the rich can cause more and worse conservation problems than the poor?</p><p></p><p>There are some fair points being made on here. </p><p></p><p>It would benefit birders immensely to have early access to many reserves they can't get onto until the birding day is at least half over - Minsmere springs to mind at once. However, there are many RSPB reserves where access is 24/7, so its not a policy issue, and it would be interesting to hear the RSPB reasoning.</p><p></p><p>Personally I liked Lodmoor when you could roam all over it, and although the RSPB has saved it from the council's intended fate, there was no real reason why management and access couldn't have continued as they were. I confess to being very worried indeed about the RSPB's involvement at Pagham, and if previous access were to be in any way reduced I would happily join a mass trespass. So far no problem, as far as I know....</p><p></p><p>Obviously their architects should be fired, preferably from a large calibre gun. The visual awfulness of the Rainham and Forsinard centres are unmatchable. I agree the modern hides are awful, the stools are crap, they squeak and are uncomfortable and there aren't enough of them, the winding mechanisms for the huge glass windows are a pain in the proverbial and should be replaced with wooden shutters that open wide enough for the biggest of telephoto lenses and also constitute something to rest them on. If Joe Public isn't comfortable, he can naff off and leave the place to hardened birders.</p><p></p><p>But the bottom line is that they are the biggest single conservation lobby in Britain, and if you had any doubt about the need for that, this week should have removed it. Any birder who is not a member should be ashamed of themselves.</p><p></p><p>John</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Farnboro John, post: 3246367, member: 36432"] You live in Britain but don't acknowledge that the rich can cause more and worse conservation problems than the poor? There are some fair points being made on here. It would benefit birders immensely to have early access to many reserves they can't get onto until the birding day is at least half over - Minsmere springs to mind at once. However, there are many RSPB reserves where access is 24/7, so its not a policy issue, and it would be interesting to hear the RSPB reasoning. Personally I liked Lodmoor when you could roam all over it, and although the RSPB has saved it from the council's intended fate, there was no real reason why management and access couldn't have continued as they were. I confess to being very worried indeed about the RSPB's involvement at Pagham, and if previous access were to be in any way reduced I would happily join a mass trespass. So far no problem, as far as I know.... Obviously their architects should be fired, preferably from a large calibre gun. The visual awfulness of the Rainham and Forsinard centres are unmatchable. I agree the modern hides are awful, the stools are crap, they squeak and are uncomfortable and there aren't enough of them, the winding mechanisms for the huge glass windows are a pain in the proverbial and should be replaced with wooden shutters that open wide enough for the biggest of telephoto lenses and also constitute something to rest them on. If Joe Public isn't comfortable, he can naff off and leave the place to hardened birders. But the bottom line is that they are the biggest single conservation lobby in Britain, and if you had any doubt about the need for that, this week should have removed it. Any birder who is not a member should be ashamed of themselves. John [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Birding
Birds & Birding
Shouldn't the RSPB mainly be to conserve birds and not other wildlife?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top