What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Sightron "Blue Sky" II 8x32
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="curvecrazy" data-source="post: 2974466" data-attributes="member: 122358"><p>I doubt most users would know a good one from a defective one. And I expect that holds for most optics scopes included. Add into that the users own eyesight limitations albeit due to faulty prescription contacts or glasses in many cases or uncorrected natural eyesight and I would imagine there's a lot of optics out there that aren't stellar and ship/slip through the cracks. :smoke:</p><p></p><p>Oh, btw... Nikon? Logical? Mmmmmmmmm???????????? Of course, based on the above statement being at least to some degree true, they probably consider letting the situation slide to be a logical approach. I don't know how many are affected but say only 10% or 25% come back to Nikon service for the problem they would be way ahead of doing 100% if they are OK with that from a corporate standpoint. </p><p></p><p>I did see a TV add for Nikon Glasses lenses so maybe thats where their focus will be ongoing and where they expect to make their money???</p><p></p><p>I wouldn't mind looking through a good M7 to compare to my sightron because someone stated the M7 was much better. I have to say the sightrons strike me as a bargain for the price, the weight, and the performance. It [SBS] would definitely serve the purpose for most users. I suppose like anything else, if you don't have something better to compare it to you would be perfectly happy and content esp. at the price point. </p><p></p><p>And then you would become like so many members here who find themselves disappointed with optics because their this or that is just slightly better say resolution etc.. Of course you know the discontent sewn comparing one thing to another. The average Joe given one of the items compared sent out to use it would likely be totally happy. Just saying. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="curvecrazy, post: 2974466, member: 122358"] I doubt most users would know a good one from a defective one. And I expect that holds for most optics scopes included. Add into that the users own eyesight limitations albeit due to faulty prescription contacts or glasses in many cases or uncorrected natural eyesight and I would imagine there's a lot of optics out there that aren't stellar and ship/slip through the cracks. :smoke: Oh, btw... Nikon? Logical? Mmmmmmmmm???????????? Of course, based on the above statement being at least to some degree true, they probably consider letting the situation slide to be a logical approach. I don't know how many are affected but say only 10% or 25% come back to Nikon service for the problem they would be way ahead of doing 100% if they are OK with that from a corporate standpoint. I did see a TV add for Nikon Glasses lenses so maybe thats where their focus will be ongoing and where they expect to make their money??? I wouldn't mind looking through a good M7 to compare to my sightron because someone stated the M7 was much better. I have to say the sightrons strike me as a bargain for the price, the weight, and the performance. It [SBS] would definitely serve the purpose for most users. I suppose like anything else, if you don't have something better to compare it to you would be perfectly happy and content esp. at the price point. And then you would become like so many members here who find themselves disappointed with optics because their this or that is just slightly better say resolution etc.. Of course you know the discontent sewn comparing one thing to another. The average Joe given one of the items compared sent out to use it would likely be totally happy. Just saying. ;) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Sightron "Blue Sky" II 8x32
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top