What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
Sigma & Other Third Party Lenses
Sigma 150-500mm OS Lens
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="john-henry" data-source="post: 1440948" data-attributes="member: 15559"><p>All I seem to hear about the Sigma 150-500 lens, mainly from people who haven’t got one or used one, is it’s ‘soft’ at 500mm wide open, well it is compared to the high end lenses (those costing several times as much) but on the other hand it’s not a bad lens for those who can’t afford these. It’s got a useful zoom range, good auto focus and an image stabilising system that works well.</p><p>It’s not my intention to try to persuade anyone to buy this lens but to give a more realistic opinion on its quality by someone who’s using one. </p><p></p><p>I’ve been using one for the past few weeks and it’s not so soft that you can’t get some decent images out of it at 500mm by stopping down to f8 or f11. The improvement in quality is immediately seen and the 4 stop OS system makes up for the lower shutter speeds to help hand-holding.</p><p></p><p>Considering the price of this lens it’s great value for money for someone who doesn’t want to carry several lenses around or can’t afford to spend a fortune on professional quality equipment, and still get good enough quality to make decent A4 prints.</p><p></p><p>The photos below give some idea of the quality throughout the zoom range of the lens, all hand-held, taken in Raw, converted to 16bit Tiff then Levels and USM applied (mainly 70% with a Radius of 0.5 applied twice) in PS7, cropped to 7”x 5” at 300ppi then cropped smaller again at 100ppi and Saved for Web at about 80%.</p><p></p><p>Mallard 2166 150mm, 1/400th @ f8, ISO 400, -0.33EV</p><p>Canada Goose 2310 200mm, 1/640th @ f8, ISO 400, -0.33EV</p><p>Rook 2032 250mm, 1/125th @ f8, ISO 400, -0.33EV</p><p>Canada Goose 2308 300mm, 1/500th @ f8, ISO 400, -0.33EV</p><p>Rook 2054 400mm, 1/160th @ f8, ISO 400, -0.67EV</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="john-henry, post: 1440948, member: 15559"] All I seem to hear about the Sigma 150-500 lens, mainly from people who haven’t got one or used one, is it’s ‘soft’ at 500mm wide open, well it is compared to the high end lenses (those costing several times as much) but on the other hand it’s not a bad lens for those who can’t afford these. It’s got a useful zoom range, good auto focus and an image stabilising system that works well. It’s not my intention to try to persuade anyone to buy this lens but to give a more realistic opinion on its quality by someone who’s using one. I’ve been using one for the past few weeks and it’s not so soft that you can’t get some decent images out of it at 500mm by stopping down to f8 or f11. The improvement in quality is immediately seen and the 4 stop OS system makes up for the lower shutter speeds to help hand-holding. Considering the price of this lens it’s great value for money for someone who doesn’t want to carry several lenses around or can’t afford to spend a fortune on professional quality equipment, and still get good enough quality to make decent A4 prints. The photos below give some idea of the quality throughout the zoom range of the lens, all hand-held, taken in Raw, converted to 16bit Tiff then Levels and USM applied (mainly 70% with a Radius of 0.5 applied twice) in PS7, cropped to 7”x 5” at 300ppi then cropped smaller again at 100ppi and Saved for Web at about 80%. Mallard 2166 150mm, 1/400th @ f8, ISO 400, -0.33EV Canada Goose 2310 200mm, 1/640th @ f8, ISO 400, -0.33EV Rook 2032 250mm, 1/125th @ f8, ISO 400, -0.33EV Canada Goose 2308 300mm, 1/500th @ f8, ISO 400, -0.33EV Rook 2054 400mm, 1/160th @ f8, ISO 400, -0.67EV [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
Sigma & Other Third Party Lenses
Sigma 150-500mm OS Lens
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top