What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
Sigma & Other Third Party Lenses
Sigma 150-500mm OS Lens
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Fozzybear" data-source="post: 1441648" data-attributes="member: 69297"><p>Have just bought a 150-500 today, a big treat to myself after a few rough weeks with a hard time at work and a week of bad headaches (now cleared up... thank God!). Although the weather is pretty rank at the moment and it's difficult to test the lens out, I did take a few shots at my back door. I found the lens is back-focusing a bit but I 'should' be able to correct that with the D300's af fine tuning. Where the focus was there was a pretty reasonable amount of detail though, it seems as though it might be as good as my 70-300VR, which would be fine with me if true. Of course I need to get the AF sorted and put some practice in to work out getting the most from it, from my initial results I need to do some work!</p><p></p><p>It was dingy, raining on and off and pretty blustery but I thought this one didn't come out too bad - was taken at ISO3200, 1/250th at f/11 on a tripod and the left foot is in focus rather than the head (I did focus on the head though - will spend some time playing with AF fine tuning...) but still not bad for all that I thought. Sharpness is much less than my old 300mm prime, but since that lens has awful colour fringing (some of which I cannot correct and looks awful) I'm hoping this will work out ok... especially after spending all that cash on it! <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /></p><p></p><p>The second shot is one I took the other day with my Nikon 70-300VR, slightly different angle but not much further away. Cropped in a bit more than the first shot I think though.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Fozzybear, post: 1441648, member: 69297"] Have just bought a 150-500 today, a big treat to myself after a few rough weeks with a hard time at work and a week of bad headaches (now cleared up... thank God!). Although the weather is pretty rank at the moment and it's difficult to test the lens out, I did take a few shots at my back door. I found the lens is back-focusing a bit but I 'should' be able to correct that with the D300's af fine tuning. Where the focus was there was a pretty reasonable amount of detail though, it seems as though it might be as good as my 70-300VR, which would be fine with me if true. Of course I need to get the AF sorted and put some practice in to work out getting the most from it, from my initial results I need to do some work! It was dingy, raining on and off and pretty blustery but I thought this one didn't come out too bad - was taken at ISO3200, 1/250th at f/11 on a tripod and the left foot is in focus rather than the head (I did focus on the head though - will spend some time playing with AF fine tuning...) but still not bad for all that I thought. Sharpness is much less than my old 300mm prime, but since that lens has awful colour fringing (some of which I cannot correct and looks awful) I'm hoping this will work out ok... especially after spending all that cash on it! ;) The second shot is one I took the other day with my Nikon 70-300VR, slightly different angle but not much further away. Cropped in a bit more than the first shot I think though. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
Sigma & Other Third Party Lenses
Sigma 150-500mm OS Lens
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top