What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
so few high end bins seem to be sold
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Kevin Purcell" data-source="post: 1487943" data-attributes="member: 68323"><p>Another way of looking at this is trying to come up with a SWAG for the number of high end bins sold to birders in the US.</p><p></p><p>First you need an estimate of the number of birders. </p><p></p><p>This part of a UK document "Birding in the United States: a demographic and economic analysis"</p><p></p><p><a href="http://www.jncc.gov.uk/PDF/pub07_waterbirds_part6.2.5.pdf" target="_blank">http://www.jncc.gov.uk/PDF/pub07_waterbirds_part6.2.5.pdf</a></p><p></p><p>is an extract of the full document </p><p></p><p>Boere, G.C., Galbraith, C.A. & Stroud, D.A. (eds). 2006. Waterbirds around the world. The Stationery Office, Edinburgh, UK. 960 pp.</p><p></p><p>from</p><p></p><p><a href="http://www.jncc.gov.uk/worldwaterbirds" target="_blank">http://www.jncc.gov.uk/worldwaterbirds</a></p><p></p><p>and summarizes the results of the 2001 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Related Recreation (FHWAR) by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Not the most recent one (there was another in 2006) but it has all the data nicely summarized.</p><p></p><p>This is just the birder bits but the full report could be used to answer the question about how many hunters are there to each birder.</p><p></p><p>So how many birders are there in 2001?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Still that's a huge number (about 15% of the total US population).</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Still huge!</p><p></p><p>Or perhaps you need a definition of a serious birder. They have one</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>So I'd say a intermediate birder could identify more than 41 species. So now I think were getting into the sort of birders with might bump into on the "local patch". So that's about 1.8 million. Or if you think away from home listers are more serious 0.9 million. No wonder "Montlake Fill" in Seattle is so crowded.</p><p></p><p>So lets say 1 million serious birders. That's still a big number. That completes the Scientific bit. Now we get the Wild-Assed Guess bit.</p><p></p><p>What fraction of these typical affluent white, middle-class, birders will spend real money on their bins. Well, typically people are price sensitive in some sort of power law fashion. </p><p></p><p>Fraction spending $N is k/(N**a)</p><p></p><p>I have no idea what the exponent a might be but lets just guess it's 1 like Zipf's Law for the occurrence of town sizes or word lengths. It might be something larger in which case people are less likely to spend more in a much stronger manner. </p><p></p><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zipf_Law" target="_blank">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zipf_Law</a></p><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rank-size_distribution" target="_blank">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rank-size_distribution</a></p><p></p><p>And I'd guess too that average serious birders spend $200 or less on a bin given the number of compacts I've seen. You might be able to guess this from the average price over all the bins you see too. I've seen quite a few cheap compacts and few porros. Perhaps this could be $150 but I doubt it's above $200.</p><p></p><p>So 0.5 = k/(200**1) so k = 100.</p><p></p><p>So the fraction having an $N bin is 100/N. A 30% might have Monarchs or Rangers. 6% might have $1500 bins.</p><p></p><p>So that's about 66,000 "Top Four" bin owners in the USA.</p><p></p><p>Lets say people buy a new bin every 10 years or so. That's perhaps 6,600 Top Four bin sales per year.</p><p></p><p>Fell free to mess about with the numbers to get whatever answer you want. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /></p><p></p><p>But I think the total number of "Top Four" bins sold per year to birders is in this order of magnitude (around 10,000).</p><p></p><p>The calculation for hunters is left as an exercise for the reader.</p><p></p><p>Another number is in the report but I only noticed it after doing the above calculation in Table 10</p><p></p><p>Table 10. Birders’ expenditures for wildlife-watching: </p><p>2001. (Population 16 years of age and older; numbers in </p><p>thousands of US dollars).</p><p></p><p>Binoculars, spotting scopes $471,264</p><p></p><p>So that's $471 million on all optics (bins and scopes) for 46 million birders. That's an average of $10ish per birder in 2001. Which if you believe the $100 average bin purchase with a 10 year lifetime is not too far from my assumptions above though it includes all birders not the "hard core" 2% I identify. </p><p></p><p>Make of that what you will.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Kevin Purcell, post: 1487943, member: 68323"] Another way of looking at this is trying to come up with a SWAG for the number of high end bins sold to birders in the US. First you need an estimate of the number of birders. This part of a UK document "Birding in the United States: a demographic and economic analysis" [url]http://www.jncc.gov.uk/PDF/pub07_waterbirds_part6.2.5.pdf[/url] is an extract of the full document Boere, G.C., Galbraith, C.A. & Stroud, D.A. (eds). 2006. Waterbirds around the world. The Stationery Office, Edinburgh, UK. 960 pp. from [url]http://www.jncc.gov.uk/worldwaterbirds[/url] and summarizes the results of the 2001 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting and Wildlife-Related Recreation (FHWAR) by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Not the most recent one (there was another in 2006) but it has all the data nicely summarized. This is just the birder bits but the full report could be used to answer the question about how many hunters are there to each birder. So how many birders are there in 2001? Still that's a huge number (about 15% of the total US population). Still huge! Or perhaps you need a definition of a serious birder. They have one So I'd say a intermediate birder could identify more than 41 species. So now I think were getting into the sort of birders with might bump into on the "local patch". So that's about 1.8 million. Or if you think away from home listers are more serious 0.9 million. No wonder "Montlake Fill" in Seattle is so crowded. So lets say 1 million serious birders. That's still a big number. That completes the Scientific bit. Now we get the Wild-Assed Guess bit. What fraction of these typical affluent white, middle-class, birders will spend real money on their bins. Well, typically people are price sensitive in some sort of power law fashion. Fraction spending $N is k/(N**a) I have no idea what the exponent a might be but lets just guess it's 1 like Zipf's Law for the occurrence of town sizes or word lengths. It might be something larger in which case people are less likely to spend more in a much stronger manner. [url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zipf_Law[/url] [url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rank-size_distribution[/url] And I'd guess too that average serious birders spend $200 or less on a bin given the number of compacts I've seen. You might be able to guess this from the average price over all the bins you see too. I've seen quite a few cheap compacts and few porros. Perhaps this could be $150 but I doubt it's above $200. So 0.5 = k/(200**1) so k = 100. So the fraction having an $N bin is 100/N. A 30% might have Monarchs or Rangers. 6% might have $1500 bins. So that's about 66,000 "Top Four" bin owners in the USA. Lets say people buy a new bin every 10 years or so. That's perhaps 6,600 Top Four bin sales per year. Fell free to mess about with the numbers to get whatever answer you want. ;) But I think the total number of "Top Four" bins sold per year to birders is in this order of magnitude (around 10,000). The calculation for hunters is left as an exercise for the reader. Another number is in the report but I only noticed it after doing the above calculation in Table 10 Table 10. Birders’ expenditures for wildlife-watching: 2001. (Population 16 years of age and older; numbers in thousands of US dollars). Binoculars, spotting scopes $471,264 So that's $471 million on all optics (bins and scopes) for 46 million birders. That's an average of $10ish per birder in 2001. Which if you believe the $100 average bin purchase with a 10 year lifetime is not too far from my assumptions above though it includes all birders not the "hard core" 2% I identify. Make of that what you will. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
so few high end bins seem to be sold
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top