What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
So, just what is a binocular factory?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="OPTIC_NUT" data-source="post: 3168622" data-attributes="member: 121951"><p>In Germany, production and engineeering were tightly coordinated and controlled until recently.</p><p>Now, bits of production get done in China.</p><p></p><p>In Japan, they started with dozens of plants the swapped contracts all the time.</p><p>Things consolidated eventually for some outfits like Nikon and Pentax,</p><p>but there are special tightly controlled plants still, like Kowa and Opticron.</p><p>They all dip in the Chinese well too.</p><p></p><p>In China, you have a handful of huge powerful plants that produce the</p><p>cream and the dregs side by side. </p><p></p><p>One thing holds true across time: the name-brand distributor's job is to</p><p>specify the design quality and ride herd over the finished product, because</p><p>batches can go very bad if you don't put trusted QC at the exit door.</p><p>Japan pretty much solved the consistency problem during the JTI years,</p><p>but troubles come and go.</p><p></p><p>Whole model lines have been dropped because the name-brand let </p><p>too much junk through and then couldn't regain control over their</p><p>Chinese factory line. Optical quality is common even at low prices.</p><p>Mechanical quality can be great....or really horrific. It can easily</p><p>spoil a great set of fully multi-coated lenses. For a worst case, though,</p><p>you can have plastic field lenses and fingerprints hidden in a design that</p><p>was awesome months before.</p><p></p><p>The quality of the actual design is hard to determine from online ratings</p><p>because almost everyone is thrilled the first few models they use.</p><p>Looking for QC trouble is easier, if the qty. of reviews is high enough.</p><p>The 'one star' and 'two star' ratings, when they have specific failures</p><p>and not some philosophical princess-and-the-pea rant, can show the</p><p>bad apples that way. Things that are variable, like fussy eye placement,</p><p>may also show there too (ie, a few design flaws may show).</p><p></p><p>For top-end stuff, it's like stereo salon equipment: </p><p>you have to make the best of the raves and colicky noises</p><p>and take it with a grain of salt.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="OPTIC_NUT, post: 3168622, member: 121951"] In Germany, production and engineeering were tightly coordinated and controlled until recently. Now, bits of production get done in China. In Japan, they started with dozens of plants the swapped contracts all the time. Things consolidated eventually for some outfits like Nikon and Pentax, but there are special tightly controlled plants still, like Kowa and Opticron. They all dip in the Chinese well too. In China, you have a handful of huge powerful plants that produce the cream and the dregs side by side. One thing holds true across time: the name-brand distributor's job is to specify the design quality and ride herd over the finished product, because batches can go very bad if you don't put trusted QC at the exit door. Japan pretty much solved the consistency problem during the JTI years, but troubles come and go. Whole model lines have been dropped because the name-brand let too much junk through and then couldn't regain control over their Chinese factory line. Optical quality is common even at low prices. Mechanical quality can be great....or really horrific. It can easily spoil a great set of fully multi-coated lenses. For a worst case, though, you can have plastic field lenses and fingerprints hidden in a design that was awesome months before. The quality of the actual design is hard to determine from online ratings because almost everyone is thrilled the first few models they use. Looking for QC trouble is easier, if the qty. of reviews is high enough. The 'one star' and 'two star' ratings, when they have specific failures and not some philosophical princess-and-the-pea rant, can show the bad apples that way. Things that are variable, like fussy eye placement, may also show there too (ie, a few design flaws may show). For top-end stuff, it's like stereo salon equipment: you have to make the best of the raves and colicky noises and take it with a grain of salt. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
So, just what is a binocular factory?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top