What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
Olympus
Some 300mm f5.5 Asanuma samples
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="RAH" data-source="post: 1632584" data-attributes="member: 5834"><p>Well, it sounds good on paper, but like some responses in that thread, I am skeptical about it when he says, "The trick is to look at a subject and know the lens well enough to turn the focusing at the speed which makes the sharp moment pop, and be able to stop PRECISELY at that point." I know that with my 120-600mm manual focus lens, there is no "sharp moment pop". I think at longer focal lengths, the depth-of-field gets so shallow that it is really difficult to distinguish in-focus from slightly out-of-focus. </p><p></p><p>But, of course, practice would help, especially using a well-lit subject at not too far a distance. I recently took several hundred shots of cormorants using my 120-600 and not one was in really good focus. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite3" alt=":(" title="Frown :(" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":(" /> However, they were too far away anyway, and I think that probably none were sharp because of the distance, the poor "seeing" conditions (atmospheric haze, etc), and the lack of contrast. I think that my results would have been kind of poor even with my 70-300 plus EC-14.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="RAH, post: 1632584, member: 5834"] Well, it sounds good on paper, but like some responses in that thread, I am skeptical about it when he says, "The trick is to look at a subject and know the lens well enough to turn the focusing at the speed which makes the sharp moment pop, and be able to stop PRECISELY at that point." I know that with my 120-600mm manual focus lens, there is no "sharp moment pop". I think at longer focal lengths, the depth-of-field gets so shallow that it is really difficult to distinguish in-focus from slightly out-of-focus. But, of course, practice would help, especially using a well-lit subject at not too far a distance. I recently took several hundred shots of cormorants using my 120-600 and not one was in really good focus. :( However, they were too far away anyway, and I think that probably none were sharp because of the distance, the poor "seeing" conditions (atmospheric haze, etc), and the lack of contrast. I think that my results would have been kind of poor even with my 70-300 plus EC-14. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
Olympus
Some 300mm f5.5 Asanuma samples
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top