What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Birding
Birds & Birding
Some people really should know better
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="deborah4" data-source="post: 1733462" data-attributes="member: 29880"><p>Eh? Since when was it within the terms of the charitable remit of the RSPB to do the work of the CPS?! Check your law!<img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /></p><p></p><p>Complex political/economical pressures, as most realists will tell you, often means pragmatic choices. Nothing wrong with the RSPB's ethics IMO and likewise, Jane's, in her commitment to the welfare of birds as priority over a commitment to photo/chase/tick/watch them etc etc.</p><p></p><p>In answer to Jane's question: Hit them where it hurts! (Hypothetically of course <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" />)</p><p></p><p>(and when you've finished, get yourself down Souf and sort a few more out!)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="deborah4, post: 1733462, member: 29880"] Eh? Since when was it within the terms of the charitable remit of the RSPB to do the work of the CPS?! Check your law!;) Complex political/economical pressures, as most realists will tell you, often means pragmatic choices. Nothing wrong with the RSPB's ethics IMO and likewise, Jane's, in her commitment to the welfare of birds as priority over a commitment to photo/chase/tick/watch them etc etc. In answer to Jane's question: Hit them where it hurts! (Hypothetically of course ;)) (and when you've finished, get yourself down Souf and sort a few more out!) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Birding
Birds & Birding
Some people really should know better
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top