What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Birding
Bird Identification Q&A
Song Sparrow or Lincoln Sparrow?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Silverwolf" data-source="post: 3441549" data-attributes="member: 84264"><p>These can be tricky species and they don't commonly co-occur in many regions, so few people are confident with them. Song sparrow is generally quickly identified because it is broader in shape, especially around the head and neck. It is also bigger than Lincoln's sparrow and the calls are very different, although that doesn't show in a photo. When I see Lincoln's it has a general gist that is more similar to a Savannah sparrow. I very rarely see Lincoln's without its crest raised, while song always has a flat domed head.</p><p></p><p>In terms of pattern the best difference is in the underparts. When you view both species from the front they are strikingly different birds. Lincoln's sparrow has a buffy chest and neat, narrow streaking. Song sparrow is (usually, but not always) paler on the underparts and the streaking is bold or smudgy. But beware the flank markings are similar in both, so you can't always tell this from a side view of the bird. Note this feature only works for adults. Juveniles are very similar, both showing nearly identical patterning, and I expect calls and shape (and possibly behaviour) are the only reliable ways to separate them.</p><p></p><p>The face pattern is less useful but Lincoln's sparrow have a definite look to them that song sparrows don't. For instance the eye stripe is narrow in Lincoln's but suddenly expands around the ear. In song sparrow the eye stripe is consistent in width and wider overall. The narrower eye stripe on Lincoln's makes the grey "eyebrow" appear much wider. This is again hard to judge on juveniles but obvious on adults. A large black triangle between the malar and throat is almost always in support of song sparrow.</p><p></p><p>These points are why I have no issues calling both the first and third mystery birds song sparrow.</p><p></p><p>edit: </p><p>California song sparrows visually are very much like song sparrows in the majority of its range. Black streaks, pale underparts.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Silverwolf, post: 3441549, member: 84264"] These can be tricky species and they don't commonly co-occur in many regions, so few people are confident with them. Song sparrow is generally quickly identified because it is broader in shape, especially around the head and neck. It is also bigger than Lincoln's sparrow and the calls are very different, although that doesn't show in a photo. When I see Lincoln's it has a general gist that is more similar to a Savannah sparrow. I very rarely see Lincoln's without its crest raised, while song always has a flat domed head. In terms of pattern the best difference is in the underparts. When you view both species from the front they are strikingly different birds. Lincoln's sparrow has a buffy chest and neat, narrow streaking. Song sparrow is (usually, but not always) paler on the underparts and the streaking is bold or smudgy. But beware the flank markings are similar in both, so you can't always tell this from a side view of the bird. Note this feature only works for adults. Juveniles are very similar, both showing nearly identical patterning, and I expect calls and shape (and possibly behaviour) are the only reliable ways to separate them. The face pattern is less useful but Lincoln's sparrow have a definite look to them that song sparrows don't. For instance the eye stripe is narrow in Lincoln's but suddenly expands around the ear. In song sparrow the eye stripe is consistent in width and wider overall. The narrower eye stripe on Lincoln's makes the grey "eyebrow" appear much wider. This is again hard to judge on juveniles but obvious on adults. A large black triangle between the malar and throat is almost always in support of song sparrow. These points are why I have no issues calling both the first and third mystery birds song sparrow. edit: California song sparrows visually are very much like song sparrows in the majority of its range. Black streaks, pale underparts. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Birding
Bird Identification Q&A
Song Sparrow or Lincoln Sparrow?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top