What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Birding
Birds & Birding
Specimens - why still the need?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Xenospiza" data-source="post: 1583386" data-attributes="member: 23772"><p>This is (of course) a recurring discussion which can lead to heated debates...</p><p></p><p>Anyone who does his best to read up on some of the great field guide writers will find a few individuals who are all in favour of collecting. Some of these work for the American institutions alluded to earlier, but <em>e.g.</em> Australia is infamous for its collecting too. The rediscovery of the Night Parrot (as a dried-out road kill) was made by a collector ready to shoot an Australian Pratincole.</p><p></p><p>The amount of birds killed for scientific purposes nowadays is <em>usually</em> negligible to what happens by other activities (habitat distruction, traffic, hunting, windows). I believe the White-throated Robin disappeared from Mount Hermon for a number of years in the 1970's due to overambitious egg-collecting.</p><p></p><p>I can <em>definitely</em> see the need for series (I'd like to have a look at Green Heron skins one day – no matter how many photos have been taken and placed on the internet, these are difficult to access and compare). This includes series for (remote) localities: while sounds, measures and (possibly) DNA are easily collected on live birds, photography is not always the strongest point of the ringers involved.</p><p></p><p>Collecting in well-known locations is rather unnecessary: I don't see what there would be to gain. However, musea are still happy to receive any specimens you can find, if only to replace the stuffy old ones.</p><p></p><p>If you look at other groups which are either impossible to identify without taking them apart or much more numerous locally than birds, I don't see what the problem with collecting could be, apart from some very popular groups: we can't have everyone taking their own butterfly/orchid/gentian specimen home...</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Xenospiza, post: 1583386, member: 23772"] This is (of course) a recurring discussion which can lead to heated debates... Anyone who does his best to read up on some of the great field guide writers will find a few individuals who are all in favour of collecting. Some of these work for the American institutions alluded to earlier, but [I]e.g.[/I] Australia is infamous for its collecting too. The rediscovery of the Night Parrot (as a dried-out road kill) was made by a collector ready to shoot an Australian Pratincole. The amount of birds killed for scientific purposes nowadays is [I]usually[/I] negligible to what happens by other activities (habitat distruction, traffic, hunting, windows). I believe the White-throated Robin disappeared from Mount Hermon for a number of years in the 1970's due to overambitious egg-collecting. I can [I]definitely[/I] see the need for series (I'd like to have a look at Green Heron skins one day – no matter how many photos have been taken and placed on the internet, these are difficult to access and compare). This includes series for (remote) localities: while sounds, measures and (possibly) DNA are easily collected on live birds, photography is not always the strongest point of the ringers involved. Collecting in well-known locations is rather unnecessary: I don't see what there would be to gain. However, musea are still happy to receive any specimens you can find, if only to replace the stuffy old ones. If you look at other groups which are either impossible to identify without taking them apart or much more numerous locally than birds, I don't see what the problem with collecting could be, apart from some very popular groups: we can't have everyone taking their own butterfly/orchid/gentian specimen home... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Birding
Birds & Birding
Specimens - why still the need?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top