What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Vortex
Stokes DLS
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Pileatus" data-source="post: 294195" data-attributes="member: 9609"><p>My comment is a question. What is the love affair with IPD's that only go down to ~ 58mm? Many Pentax and EO models simply won't work properly for anyone with an IPD < 58mm and now the Vortex model comes out with an IPD at or above 58mm. The Audubon Equinox (an EO associated company) had a lower IPD (54mm) and I'm wondering why newly designed bins aren't designed with as wide a range as possible. FWIW, most roofs by Nikon, Zeiss, Leica, and Swarovski go down to 56mm or less (Zeiss = 54mm).</p><p></p><p>I'll speculate that many mid-priced bins are created from existing housings and that "design" consists of selecting glass, coatings, and final finish. The Vortex, however, is pushing the $1000 mark so consumers should expect excellent build quality, focus control, cold-weather use, precise and stable collimation, shock resistance, fog and wateproofing, etc. </p><p></p><p>John</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Pileatus, post: 294195, member: 9609"] My comment is a question. What is the love affair with IPD's that only go down to ~ 58mm? Many Pentax and EO models simply won't work properly for anyone with an IPD < 58mm and now the Vortex model comes out with an IPD at or above 58mm. The Audubon Equinox (an EO associated company) had a lower IPD (54mm) and I'm wondering why newly designed bins aren't designed with as wide a range as possible. FWIW, most roofs by Nikon, Zeiss, Leica, and Swarovski go down to 56mm or less (Zeiss = 54mm). I'll speculate that many mid-priced bins are created from existing housings and that "design" consists of selecting glass, coatings, and final finish. The Vortex, however, is pushing the $1000 mark so consumers should expect excellent build quality, focus control, cold-weather use, precise and stable collimation, shock resistance, fog and wateproofing, etc. John [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Vortex
Stokes DLS
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top