What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Birding
Bird Taxonomy and Nomenclature
Struthideidae
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="l_raty" data-source="post: 1621810" data-attributes="member: 24811"><p>Or should it rather be:</p><p>"The family name "Struthideidae" is older by one year than the name "Corcoracidae", and thus should normally have priority, but in fact the family consisting of <em>Corcorax</em> and <em>Struthidea</em> alone has always been listed as "Corcoracidae", and this should therefore remain the valid name for the family thus constituted."</p><p>...?</p><p></p><p>[Note <a href="http://www.iczn.org/iczn/index.jsp?article=35&nfv=" target="_blank">Art. 35.5 of the ICZN</a>: "<strong>Precedence for names in use at higher rank.</strong> If after 1999 a name in use for a family-group taxon (e.g. for a subfamily) is found to be older than a name in prevailing usage for a taxon at higher rank in the same family-group taxon (e.g. for the family within which the older name is the name of a subfamily) the older name is not to displace the younger name."]</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="l_raty, post: 1621810, member: 24811"] Or should it rather be: "The family name "Struthideidae" is older by one year than the name "Corcoracidae", and thus should normally have priority, but in fact the family consisting of [I]Corcorax[/I] and [I]Struthidea[/I] alone has always been listed as "Corcoracidae", and this should therefore remain the valid name for the family thus constituted." ...? [Note [URL="http://www.iczn.org/iczn/index.jsp?article=35&nfv="]Art. 35.5 of the ICZN[/URL]: "[B]Precedence for names in use at higher rank.[/B] If after 1999 a name in use for a family-group taxon (e.g. for a subfamily) is found to be older than a name in prevailing usage for a taxon at higher rank in the same family-group taxon (e.g. for the family within which the older name is the name of a subfamily) the older name is not to displace the younger name."] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Birding
Bird Taxonomy and Nomenclature
Struthideidae
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top