What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Birding
Bird Taxonomy and Nomenclature
Subspecies
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="cuckooroller" data-source="post: 2419287" data-attributes="member: 1557"><p>Well, probably not recognised by the casual "birder" as per his definition of such. However, I would imagine that there are a lot of even the casual "birder" that become interested in the various species concepts even if he initially wanted to just find out what that pretty bird was that he just saw in his backyard. All of the various species concepts have their relative merits though personally I might consider rather useless if not just as a theoretical construct a species concept that would have it that carried to its logical extreme each individual bird can be viewed as a defineable taxonomic unit, that is to say, a total abdication of attempting to define parameters for analysis of bird populations below the species level.</p><p></p><p>Certainly, I agree with him that mankind's attempt to further refine the techniques used, to review the past work done for the definition and description of subspecific taxa should be undertaken and is laudable just on the basis of common scientific rigor. The number of presently accepted bird races is certainly rife with inexactitude. We certainly need to get better in the descriptions and in our choices of the reproducible parameters used from case to case.</p><p></p><p>Presently there does not seem to be an overarching set of rules by which to assign taxa below the species level (actually, even assigning species level is problematic). There are lots of statistical models out there and a lot of researchers that seem to just stick their hands in the choice bowl until they find one that justifies their findings. It is probably more useful to give preeminence to just one. The Tobias scheme is the one that I find most worthy lately. I have also found extremely worthy of merit the model known as Ecological Niche Modeling.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="cuckooroller, post: 2419287, member: 1557"] Well, probably not recognised by the casual "birder" as per his definition of such. However, I would imagine that there are a lot of even the casual "birder" that become interested in the various species concepts even if he initially wanted to just find out what that pretty bird was that he just saw in his backyard. All of the various species concepts have their relative merits though personally I might consider rather useless if not just as a theoretical construct a species concept that would have it that carried to its logical extreme each individual bird can be viewed as a defineable taxonomic unit, that is to say, a total abdication of attempting to define parameters for analysis of bird populations below the species level. Certainly, I agree with him that mankind's attempt to further refine the techniques used, to review the past work done for the definition and description of subspecific taxa should be undertaken and is laudable just on the basis of common scientific rigor. The number of presently accepted bird races is certainly rife with inexactitude. We certainly need to get better in the descriptions and in our choices of the reproducible parameters used from case to case. Presently there does not seem to be an overarching set of rules by which to assign taxa below the species level (actually, even assigning species level is problematic). There are lots of statistical models out there and a lot of researchers that seem to just stick their hands in the choice bowl until they find one that justifies their findings. It is probably more useful to give preeminence to just one. The Tobias scheme is the one that I find most worthy lately. I have also found extremely worthy of merit the model known as Ecological Niche Modeling. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Birding
Bird Taxonomy and Nomenclature
Subspecies
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top