What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
SV versus SF versus NV
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Chosun Juan" data-source="post: 3477405" data-attributes="member: 92780"><p>Ok, let's put this little misunderstanding to rest, as you both seem to have missed the mark of what Jan is saying. :brains:</p><p></p><p>Jan is talking about the protrusion of the focus wheel above the bridge in the "depth" direction (or thickness in the commonly used binocular dimensions of HxWxD) ie. if you look from the objective end of the binoculars, it is the height that the focus wheel is above the bridge.</p><p></p><p>Jan is saying that the NV focus wheel sits flush with the top of the bridge, the SV's wheel just peeks above by the rim, and the SF has the largest diameter focus wheel which sticks up the greatest height above the bridge. Hope the photo below serves to illustrate what Jan is saying.</p><p>[ATTACH]604010[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p>FWIW, in a 42mm bin, which I find small in the hand and with a wide bridge, such as an ED3, I place my middle finger of the focusing hand on the bridge which eliminates any SV dogleg of the focusing finger as shown in the Zeiss advertising! :eek!:</p><p></p><p>Bruce, you make a good point (it just wasn't Jan's! <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /> about measuring the distance of the focus wheel from the eye end of the eyecups. As the position of the focus wheel and bridge construction determine where your hands are placed, this distance compared to the centre of mass of the binocular determine it's balance.</p><p></p><p>If the centre of mass is located in the center of the hands the bin would feel balanced in the hand. If the centre of mass is located behind the centre of the hands, then the bins will have a rearward weight bias as in the case of the SF with it's combination lightened objectives, heavier oculars, and forward shifted focuser. This is somewhat desireable for extended viewing, and a welcome innovation. However, if this achieved soley by moving the focus wheel way forward, then the load on the shoulders increases, and it becomes more smoke and mirrors.</p><p></p><p>If the centre of mass is forward of the centre of the hands, then the binocular will tend to tip forward, and you would be in possession of one of the rare AV models (Ant Viewer! <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /> :-O</p><p></p><p>Hope this helps o<img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p></p><p>Chosun :gh:</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Chosun Juan, post: 3477405, member: 92780"] Ok, let's put this little misunderstanding to rest, as you both seem to have missed the mark of what Jan is saying. :brains: Jan is talking about the protrusion of the focus wheel above the bridge in the "depth" direction (or thickness in the commonly used binocular dimensions of HxWxD) ie. if you look from the objective end of the binoculars, it is the height that the focus wheel is above the bridge. Jan is saying that the NV focus wheel sits flush with the top of the bridge, the SV's wheel just peeks above by the rim, and the SF has the largest diameter focus wheel which sticks up the greatest height above the bridge. Hope the photo below serves to illustrate what Jan is saying. [ATTACH]604010._xfImport[/ATTACH] FWIW, in a 42mm bin, which I find small in the hand and with a wide bridge, such as an ED3, I place my middle finger of the focusing hand on the bridge which eliminates any SV dogleg of the focusing finger as shown in the Zeiss advertising! :eek!: Bruce, you make a good point (it just wasn't Jan's! :) about measuring the distance of the focus wheel from the eye end of the eyecups. As the position of the focus wheel and bridge construction determine where your hands are placed, this distance compared to the centre of mass of the binocular determine it's balance. If the centre of mass is located in the center of the hands the bin would feel balanced in the hand. If the centre of mass is located behind the centre of the hands, then the bins will have a rearward weight bias as in the case of the SF with it's combination lightened objectives, heavier oculars, and forward shifted focuser. This is somewhat desireable for extended viewing, and a welcome innovation. However, if this achieved soley by moving the focus wheel way forward, then the load on the shoulders increases, and it becomes more smoke and mirrors. If the centre of mass is forward of the centre of the hands, then the binocular will tend to tip forward, and you would be in possession of one of the rare AV models (Ant Viewer! :) :-O Hope this helps o:) Chosun :gh: [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
SV versus SF versus NV
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top