What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
SV versus SF versus NV
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Chosun Juan" data-source="post: 3480666" data-attributes="member: 92780"><p>Bruce, A 50mm SF should tick both boxes eh?! :t: :-O</p><p></p><p>I can understand your's (and Jerry's) impressions that the 42mm 10x42 SF appears quite bright due to the welcome wide and sharp Fov and the transmission curve peaking in the greenish-yellow (the so called green ham tint that some people see - more HT glass would fix that! <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /> but I ain't buyin' those Allbino's transmission figures - nosireee! ...... :brains:</p><p></p><p>Zeiss themselves claim 92% for the SF and 95% for the HT (who could forget the famous <em>"light transmission up to 95% or more"</em> marketing fluff! <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /> <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /></p><p></p><p>This is more in-line considering the optical constructions and materials of both. I don't know whether Allbino's have changed their testing protocols, equipment, or calibrations, but some of the figures seem a bit odd?</p><p></p><p></p><p>Chosun :gh:</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Chosun Juan, post: 3480666, member: 92780"] Bruce, A 50mm SF should tick both boxes eh?! :t: :-O I can understand your's (and Jerry's) impressions that the 42mm 10x42 SF appears quite bright due to the welcome wide and sharp Fov and the transmission curve peaking in the greenish-yellow (the so called green ham tint that some people see - more HT glass would fix that! :) but I ain't buyin' those Allbino's transmission figures - nosireee! ...... :brains: Zeiss themselves claim 92% for the SF and 95% for the HT (who could forget the famous [I]"light transmission up to 95% or more"[/I] marketing fluff! :) ;) This is more in-line considering the optical constructions and materials of both. I don't know whether Allbino's have changed their testing protocols, equipment, or calibrations, but some of the figures seem a bit odd? Chosun :gh: [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
SV versus SF versus NV
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top