What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
swarovision 10x42 vs canon 10x42 is
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Troubador" data-source="post: 3609028" data-attributes="member: 109211"><p>Ted</p><p>I was certainly teasing Dennis a little because there was a time when he would have unleashed an Escalade-load of posts in response but these days he is above rising to such teasing.</p><p></p><p>Do I think Canon IS binos are curiously ugly things? Certainly I do but hey, beauty is only skin deep and Canon's IS binos do what they say on the can.</p><p></p><p>In the dim and distant past, despite my fave brand being Zeiss, I have also said of their FL model that only its mother would think it attractive. But FL 8x32 is a great little bino, as is Meopta's MeoStar 8x32 that a few years ago to me looked strangely afflicted with a spotty disease but now after using it in the field it is a model I am very fond of.</p><p></p><p>Teasing and joking doesn't necessarily mean a lack of respect, either for Canon's IS binos or Dennis.</p><p></p><p>Lee</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Troubador, post: 3609028, member: 109211"] Ted I was certainly teasing Dennis a little because there was a time when he would have unleashed an Escalade-load of posts in response but these days he is above rising to such teasing. Do I think Canon IS binos are curiously ugly things? Certainly I do but hey, beauty is only skin deep and Canon's IS binos do what they say on the can. In the dim and distant past, despite my fave brand being Zeiss, I have also said of their FL model that only its mother would think it attractive. But FL 8x32 is a great little bino, as is Meopta's MeoStar 8x32 that a few years ago to me looked strangely afflicted with a spotty disease but now after using it in the field it is a model I am very fond of. Teasing and joking doesn't necessarily mean a lack of respect, either for Canon's IS binos or Dennis. Lee [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
swarovision 10x42 vs canon 10x42 is
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top