What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Swarovski
swarovision EL
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="elkcub" data-source="post: 1701662" data-attributes="member: 14473"><p>It may be that there is a causal relationship between <em>field curvature</em> (i.e., a "flat field") and "rolling ball" perception, but to my knowledge this psychological phenomenon is primarily associated with the aberration of <em>distortion</em>. </p><p></p><p><u>Field curvature</u> has to do with the the focal surface of the image, which is, essentially, a spherical cap. Depending on the expert, some amount of field curvature is considered beneficial for the observer. Still, some people want to eliminate it altogether. <u>Distortion</u> has to do with image magnification as a function of field angle, — where increasing magnification results in pincushion distortion and decreasing magnification results in barrel distortion. (Only the unique case of constant magnification results in a rectilinear image.) Some amount of pincushion is beneficial to the observer for minimizing rolling ball perception; still, some people want to eliminate it altogether.</p><p></p><p>Because the two parameters are design independent, a completely flat field binocular may be given sufficient pincushion distortion to minimize rolling ball perception. Vertical images viewed at the edge will curve outwards to some extent, but still be in focus. Conversely, an instrument that produces a perfectly rectilinear image across the field will necessarily produce some rolling ball perception. It may or may not be given field curvature, depending upon the design, so that the edges may be somewhat out of focus. </p><p></p><p>What it comes down to, therefore, is that the user must ultimately decide what amount of these two aberrations is most effective for his/her own viewing needs. All the rest is either strong opinion or commercial rhetoric. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /></p><p></p><p>Ed</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="elkcub, post: 1701662, member: 14473"] It may be that there is a causal relationship between [i]field curvature[/i] (i.e., a "flat field") and "rolling ball" perception, but to my knowledge this psychological phenomenon is primarily associated with the aberration of [i]distortion[/i]. [u]Field curvature[/u] has to do with the the focal surface of the image, which is, essentially, a spherical cap. Depending on the expert, some amount of field curvature is considered beneficial for the observer. Still, some people want to eliminate it altogether. [u]Distortion[/u] has to do with image magnification as a function of field angle, — where increasing magnification results in pincushion distortion and decreasing magnification results in barrel distortion. (Only the unique case of constant magnification results in a rectilinear image.) Some amount of pincushion is beneficial to the observer for minimizing rolling ball perception; still, some people want to eliminate it altogether. Because the two parameters are design independent, a completely flat field binocular may be given sufficient pincushion distortion to minimize rolling ball perception. Vertical images viewed at the edge will curve outwards to some extent, but still be in focus. Conversely, an instrument that produces a perfectly rectilinear image across the field will necessarily produce some rolling ball perception. It may or may not be given field curvature, depending upon the design, so that the edges may be somewhat out of focus. What it comes down to, therefore, is that the user must ultimately decide what amount of these two aberrations is most effective for his/her own viewing needs. All the rest is either strong opinion or commercial rhetoric. ;) Ed [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Swarovski
swarovision EL
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top