Here you write the AFOV of the Swarovski is bigger. Didn't you mean the Zeiss like JavierV stated? The FOV should be the same, but the AFOV is bigger? at the Zeiss because of the 8,1 power of the Zeiss (on the CL it is 7,8). I don't know if that is true, but I have read that.
Comparing the two again today in response to your question, the AFOV now looks the same. When I originally compared them in response to Javier's post it did seem the AFOV of the SW was slightly larger -- but not today. The SW is slightly brighter again today in good light, but is only seen in direct comparison between the two. The overall optical performance of the Zeiss is very close to the Swarovski. The biggest difference for me is the lighter smoother focus function of the CL makes one handed use noticeably easier if that would be important to you. When using both hands, I prefer the overall handling of the Zeiss.