What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Spotting Scopes & tripod/heads
Swarovski
Swarovski TLS APO 23 DSLR Adapter
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="opticoholic" data-source="post: 3368271" data-attributes="member: 18608"><p>Frank,</p><p>I'm sure Neil will reply, but I had the same reaction to the full sized image: a lot of noise. Then I looked and I can see it was at ISO 2000. Plus the image probably has zero Noise Reduction applied. I think many of us are accustomed and perhaps not aware of noise reduction that gets automatically applied to RAW images. i.e., some might be shocked to see the <em>true</em> noise level in images before noise reduction algorithms are applied (same goes for your iPhone images for sure). However micro-4/3 sensors with 20 megapixels can be expected to have more noise. Even with the slightly larger pixels on my 16MP Olympus E-M1, I always try to stay at ISO 800 or lower if I can, even if it means the shutter speed is slower than I would like. Keeping the ISO as low as I can helps both noise and dynamic range. These mirrorless cameras have electronic shutter and with a good tripod, remote release and a stationary subject, you can get sharp images at slower shutter speeds. Just my 2 cents.</p><p></p><p>Dave</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="opticoholic, post: 3368271, member: 18608"] Frank, I'm sure Neil will reply, but I had the same reaction to the full sized image: a lot of noise. Then I looked and I can see it was at ISO 2000. Plus the image probably has zero Noise Reduction applied. I think many of us are accustomed and perhaps not aware of noise reduction that gets automatically applied to RAW images. i.e., some might be shocked to see the [I]true[/I] noise level in images before noise reduction algorithms are applied (same goes for your iPhone images for sure). However micro-4/3 sensors with 20 megapixels can be expected to have more noise. Even with the slightly larger pixels on my 16MP Olympus E-M1, I always try to stay at ISO 800 or lower if I can, even if it means the shutter speed is slower than I would like. Keeping the ISO as low as I can helps both noise and dynamic range. These mirrorless cameras have electronic shutter and with a good tripod, remote release and a stationary subject, you can get sharp images at slower shutter speeds. Just my 2 cents. Dave [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Spotting Scopes & tripod/heads
Swarovski
Swarovski TLS APO 23 DSLR Adapter
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top