• Welcome to BirdForum, the internet's largest birding community with thousands of members from all over the world. The forums are dedicated to wild birds, birding, binoculars and equipment and all that goes with it.

    Please register for an account to take part in the discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
ZEISS DTI thermal imaging cameras. For more discoveries at night, and during the day.

Switching to mirrorless from Canon D80 + 100-400 II (1 Viewer)

Shumi

Well-known member
Ukraine
Hi All, the time has come for the switch to mirrorless - and I ask for your kind advice. My question is - how do i choose the "mirrorless analogue" of the body+lens system that I am using now?

Currently I am using Canon D80 + 100-400 II, and I am fully satisfied with it - it offers the optimal balance between (1) weight, (2) image quality and (3) price. I travel often, also overseas, and have back/neck issues - so I cannot carry a heavy camera. I am a birder, not a photographer, and I do not aim for the National Geographic level of quality - but I do want the pics I take to be of decent quality.

I have done a bit of research and my current (probably, very limited!) understanding is as follows:

1. Body - as far as birding is concerned, the best mirrorless analogue for Canon 7d Mark 2 (and Canon D80) appears to be Canon R7;

2. Lens - looks like i have two choices. One is Canon RF 100-400 - which would offer me the same magnification as I currently have, a considerably lower weight and cost, which would be compensated by a somewhat lower image quality.
The other option would be Canon RF 100-500 - which looks like the direct mirrorless analogue of the lens I am using now. The cost and weight, however, would be much higher if compared with the simpler RF 100-400 option - and I am not really sure whether it really makes sense to buy this more expensive and heavy lens...

I would be grateful for your comments/views on the above. Does my line of thinking make sense? Have I missed something obvious? And which of the two lenses would you recommend?

Thanks!
 
Panamoz have a Canon R7 with an adaptor for £1190 which means that you could use your EF100-400 II. I used the EF100-400 II with an adaptor and it worked fine. Later I switched to the RF100-500 for extra reach.

Colin
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top