What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
Sigma & Other Third Party Lenses
Tamron 200-500mm vs. Sigma 50-500mm DG
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DOC" data-source="post: 459461" data-attributes="member: 6414"><p>I myself was having the same problem - on deciding between the Tamron and Bigma.</p><p>Finally ( with Rezmole's help and advice ) i got the Tamron and i must say i am very pleased with it and have produced some very fine pics.</p><p>The main issue regarding which lense to buy was the fact that i wanted something that i can hand hold and get some "in flight shots" with ease. The Bigma is too heavy for that . ( on a tripod - there's no difference- they are all steady and easy ).</p><p>The Tamron has never left the camera since then.</p><p>A 500 or 600 m"m prime lense is surely better but considering the average bird photographer and budget - i find the Tamron \ Bigma a great solution . I think that the differences are minor .</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DOC, post: 459461, member: 6414"] I myself was having the same problem - on deciding between the Tamron and Bigma. Finally ( with Rezmole's help and advice ) i got the Tamron and i must say i am very pleased with it and have produced some very fine pics. The main issue regarding which lense to buy was the fact that i wanted something that i can hand hold and get some "in flight shots" with ease. The Bigma is too heavy for that . ( on a tripod - there's no difference- they are all steady and easy ). The Tamron has never left the camera since then. A 500 or 600 m"m prime lense is surely better but considering the average bird photographer and budget - i find the Tamron \ Bigma a great solution . I think that the differences are minor . [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
Sigma & Other Third Party Lenses
Tamron 200-500mm vs. Sigma 50-500mm DG
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top