What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Terra, Premier, Monarch... ???
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="John Dracon" data-source="post: 3191377" data-attributes="member: 14799"><p>Gentlemen - Information you have been sharing about the topic of "resolution" is most interesting to me. Finding myself in what are called the declining years (through no fault of my own, I might add) hence I am not a "victim" in any sense of that word which is bandied around by the popular media today), I yearn for simple explanations for highly complex issues and things themselves. Of course this is unrealistic.</p><p></p><p>It appears to me that how we resolve and what we resolve is a function of two variables, our visual system and the binocular itself. The latter is the constant. even with microscopic differences. But billions of humans with their own set of eyes and facial features are all uniquely different. One of my eyes sees color differently from the other, and one "resolves" a wee bit better. This in itself is not unusual. But we must be driving the optical engineers insane trying to satisfy the whims and caprice of human beings, not to mention one another as we share our "findings" with each other.</p><p></p><p>As a young lad with out the pot and window to do you-know-what, an old retired navy chief gave me a beat up old pair of Zeiss 7x50 IF binoculars. This is the story he told me. Zeiss supplied many of these binoculars to the United States Navy years before WW2 began. As they were phased out by B&L binoculars, these became surplus, and that is how he acquired him.</p><p></p><p>He knew I was interested in looking at birds and didn't possess any binoculars at all. I still have them and take them out of the dried out old, black leather case for a quick peek now and then. Guess what? They are still in collimation. And though uncoated, they render a very good picture absent the bright colors seen in today's binoculars. I have tried to date them from old catalogs and estimate they were made in the late 1920s or early 1930s. Still useful. No fungus at all. On a black and white resolution chart they hold their own with any modern 7x50. Or are my own lying eyes deceiving me?</p><p></p><p>John</p><p></p><p>John</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="John Dracon, post: 3191377, member: 14799"] Gentlemen - Information you have been sharing about the topic of "resolution" is most interesting to me. Finding myself in what are called the declining years (through no fault of my own, I might add) hence I am not a "victim" in any sense of that word which is bandied around by the popular media today), I yearn for simple explanations for highly complex issues and things themselves. Of course this is unrealistic. It appears to me that how we resolve and what we resolve is a function of two variables, our visual system and the binocular itself. The latter is the constant. even with microscopic differences. But billions of humans with their own set of eyes and facial features are all uniquely different. One of my eyes sees color differently from the other, and one "resolves" a wee bit better. This in itself is not unusual. But we must be driving the optical engineers insane trying to satisfy the whims and caprice of human beings, not to mention one another as we share our "findings" with each other. As a young lad with out the pot and window to do you-know-what, an old retired navy chief gave me a beat up old pair of Zeiss 7x50 IF binoculars. This is the story he told me. Zeiss supplied many of these binoculars to the United States Navy years before WW2 began. As they were phased out by B&L binoculars, these became surplus, and that is how he acquired him. He knew I was interested in looking at birds and didn't possess any binoculars at all. I still have them and take them out of the dried out old, black leather case for a quick peek now and then. Guess what? They are still in collimation. And though uncoated, they render a very good picture absent the bright colors seen in today's binoculars. I have tried to date them from old catalogs and estimate they were made in the late 1920s or early 1930s. Still useful. No fungus at all. On a black and white resolution chart they hold their own with any modern 7x50. Or are my own lying eyes deceiving me? John John [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Terra, Premier, Monarch... ???
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top