What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Zeiss
The 10X42 HT compared to the SF and SV
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="james holdsworth" data-source="post: 3426855" data-attributes="member: 79864"><p>That's the problem with being here [on this forum] for too long - it's the clutter of information about things we already know enough about.</p><p></p><p>It doesn't matter the model or issue - well after consensus is reached we get individual reports of CA, poor sharpness, poor focus, poor build etc. and then [thereafter] all of these problems reported individually take on a life of their own, even though they may diverge wildly from the consensus.</p><p></p><p>Something like the 8x32 SV was a good example - generally loved by most that used it but [over time] a few reports of glare, CA, poor focus, poor sharpness - these could all be from one report - and the whole model becomes tainted. Dennis is notorious for taking a single comment, maybe staining of the SF armour, and just repeating it in enough threads that most everyone starts to believe it's a real problem.</p><p></p><p>I try to read the 1st few months worth of reports and go from those - anything coming later tends to be just noise to confuse the issue.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="james holdsworth, post: 3426855, member: 79864"] That's the problem with being here [on this forum] for too long - it's the clutter of information about things we already know enough about. It doesn't matter the model or issue - well after consensus is reached we get individual reports of CA, poor sharpness, poor focus, poor build etc. and then [thereafter] all of these problems reported individually take on a life of their own, even though they may diverge wildly from the consensus. Something like the 8x32 SV was a good example - generally loved by most that used it but [over time] a few reports of glare, CA, poor focus, poor sharpness - these could all be from one report - and the whole model becomes tainted. Dennis is notorious for taking a single comment, maybe staining of the SF armour, and just repeating it in enough threads that most everyone starts to believe it's a real problem. I try to read the 1st few months worth of reports and go from those - anything coming later tends to be just noise to confuse the issue. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Zeiss
The 10X42 HT compared to the SF and SV
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top