What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Zeiss
The 10X42 HT compared to the SF and SV
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="SuperDuty" data-source="post: 3427374" data-attributes="member: 133977"><p>The HT is much better at controlling CA than than any of the 10X SVs, and also to a slightly lesser degree the 8.5X SV, but still much better. I also find it considerably better than the 10X42 SF in that regard, I am VERY CA sensitive, so many others won't see it that way. The ZenRay ED 2 and Kowa Genesis were similarly excellent with CA, but that's where the similarities end. I guess my only nit to pick in the10X42 HT is the amount of pincushion distortion, coming from the SV series, and not being at all bothered by globe effect, I could live with a lot less. The SF, with the transmission and CA control of HT, would be a true leap toward perfection that doesn't exist at the present time IMO. So far I haven't seen an FL of any configuration.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="SuperDuty, post: 3427374, member: 133977"] The HT is much better at controlling CA than than any of the 10X SVs, and also to a slightly lesser degree the 8.5X SV, but still much better. I also find it considerably better than the 10X42 SF in that regard, I am VERY CA sensitive, so many others won't see it that way. The ZenRay ED 2 and Kowa Genesis were similarly excellent with CA, but that's where the similarities end. I guess my only nit to pick in the10X42 HT is the amount of pincushion distortion, coming from the SV series, and not being at all bothered by globe effect, I could live with a lot less. The SF, with the transmission and CA control of HT, would be a true leap toward perfection that doesn't exist at the present time IMO. So far I haven't seen an FL of any configuration. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Zeiss
The 10X42 HT compared to the SF and SV
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top