What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Leica
the 92% compared with the 95%...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="mak" data-source="post: 3632714" data-attributes="member: 774"><p>Lee.</p><p></p><p>The 95% quote is correct, but as you should know, it is at a certain nm reading. it is not always 95% across a wide range. Other binoculars achieve over 91-92% across a wider spectrum so at a certain nm figure could be said to have a higher transmission reading than those which have a high figure at a specific point. Some optical guys (who are really in the know) state that 5% variation is noticeable, but not less. I also think in some instances the "badge" makes all the difference to individuals perception of light transmission? </p><p></p><p>mak</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="mak, post: 3632714, member: 774"] Lee. The 95% quote is correct, but as you should know, it is at a certain nm reading. it is not always 95% across a wide range. Other binoculars achieve over 91-92% across a wider spectrum so at a certain nm figure could be said to have a higher transmission reading than those which have a high figure at a specific point. Some optical guys (who are really in the know) state that 5% variation is noticeable, but not less. I also think in some instances the "badge" makes all the difference to individuals perception of light transmission? mak [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Leica
the 92% compared with the 95%...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top