What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
The Cameraland NY Mystery Binocular
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Kevin Purcell" data-source="post: 1277344" data-attributes="member: 68323"><p>But those comments are about the ProMaster products for 3 or 4 years ago. As ProMaster are a brand and sell OEMed products it might even be that the current range of ProMaster Elite bins are designed and made by a different OEM from the previous ones.</p><p></p><p>Plus Chinese optical manufacture has moved on in the past few years. The technical product quality is significantly better than just a few years ago.</p><p></p><p>For example, in 2006 Tero was actually impressed by ProMaster (which is saying something for his "almost a Sporter" Finnish outlook <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /> )</p><p></p><p><a href="http://www.birdforum.net/showpost.php?p=508213&postcount=8" target="_blank">http://www.birdforum.net/showpost.php?p=508213&postcount=8</a></p><p></p><p>And it's quite clear, as you say, several others are impressed by the ELX, both here and on the 24campfire.com threads. So it seems reasonable to check out the other bins which seem to be coming from the same design house and the same OEM with the same coatings minus the ED objectives (and in different sizes for those that like 32mm objectives).</p><p></p><p>Perhaps all these are sharing some of the same design. They are all 8 elements in 6 groups for the top end and bottom end Elites: 2 in the objective, 1 or two in the focuser (probably 1 though 2 would control CA a bit better) and 4 or 5 in th eye piece (again 5 elements would control stray color better especially with a wide FOV and long ER). Of course that's just a crude measure (it depends how they optimized the whole system). But I suspect they share some parts.</p><p></p><p>A week ago I would have written off Promaster as another OEM rebadging shop. Perhaps they are but if they're rebadging good stuff then I'd like to know.</p><p></p><p>And that takes us full circle to Steve's comments about blind tests. </p><p></p><p>So as usual looking through the bins and performing some empirical tests is the best way to find out the answer. And there are enough binocuholics around here who would rise to this sort of a challenge <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Kevin Purcell, post: 1277344, member: 68323"] But those comments are about the ProMaster products for 3 or 4 years ago. As ProMaster are a brand and sell OEMed products it might even be that the current range of ProMaster Elite bins are designed and made by a different OEM from the previous ones. Plus Chinese optical manufacture has moved on in the past few years. The technical product quality is significantly better than just a few years ago. For example, in 2006 Tero was actually impressed by ProMaster (which is saying something for his "almost a Sporter" Finnish outlook ;) ) [url]http://www.birdforum.net/showpost.php?p=508213&postcount=8[/url] And it's quite clear, as you say, several others are impressed by the ELX, both here and on the 24campfire.com threads. So it seems reasonable to check out the other bins which seem to be coming from the same design house and the same OEM with the same coatings minus the ED objectives (and in different sizes for those that like 32mm objectives). Perhaps all these are sharing some of the same design. They are all 8 elements in 6 groups for the top end and bottom end Elites: 2 in the objective, 1 or two in the focuser (probably 1 though 2 would control CA a bit better) and 4 or 5 in th eye piece (again 5 elements would control stray color better especially with a wide FOV and long ER). Of course that's just a crude measure (it depends how they optimized the whole system). But I suspect they share some parts. A week ago I would have written off Promaster as another OEM rebadging shop. Perhaps they are but if they're rebadging good stuff then I'd like to know. And that takes us full circle to Steve's comments about blind tests. So as usual looking through the bins and performing some empirical tests is the best way to find out the answer. And there are enough binocuholics around here who would rise to this sort of a challenge ;) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
The Cameraland NY Mystery Binocular
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top