What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Wildlife Art
The Devil is in the . . . . .
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="mosca" data-source="post: 1728356" data-attributes="member: 69162"><p>To be honest whoever wrote that sounds as narrow minded as some of the teachers I mentioned in an earlier or friends who say wildlife art is not as proper as “high art”. Perhaps I’m missing a point somewhere?</p><p></p><p>It is interesting to see the background of some artists here too as it gives a broader scope of thought processes.</p><p>My own was of a very contemporary approach to modern art with a few successful exhibitions, shows and sales and whathaveyou.</p><p></p><p>Anyway the point I want to make is this. I have recently been trying to draw realistic pictures with pencils using photographs (and some field work too). As I had such a “modern” art background I very rarely had the chance to do realist-ish drawings before. It is quite liberating being restricted in this way. I do not intend my pencil drawings to demonstrate the life, character, essence or breath of the bird. I am playing around with pencils seeing if I can describe the textures and colours using just graphite and paper. There is no devoid of feeling or emotion as non was intended (does that make sense? <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite8" alt=":D" title="Big grin :D" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":D" />). I enjoy wildlife and so am drawing what I like (and why not?) while trying to learn a new area of art. </p><p></p><p>I can see the argument that wildlife art is not high art, working from photos is not field work, painting is dead modern art has moved on etcetera. But I thought Duchamp put an end to this type of thinking with his urinal?</p><p></p><p>To me there is room for all types of facets of art. Tim said I think this is great as it lets us get on with doing what we do regardless. To me it is about the quality of the work not the style and there is plenty of room for all.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="mosca, post: 1728356, member: 69162"] To be honest whoever wrote that sounds as narrow minded as some of the teachers I mentioned in an earlier or friends who say wildlife art is not as proper as “high art”. Perhaps I’m missing a point somewhere? It is interesting to see the background of some artists here too as it gives a broader scope of thought processes. My own was of a very contemporary approach to modern art with a few successful exhibitions, shows and sales and whathaveyou. Anyway the point I want to make is this. I have recently been trying to draw realistic pictures with pencils using photographs (and some field work too). As I had such a “modern” art background I very rarely had the chance to do realist-ish drawings before. It is quite liberating being restricted in this way. I do not intend my pencil drawings to demonstrate the life, character, essence or breath of the bird. I am playing around with pencils seeing if I can describe the textures and colours using just graphite and paper. There is no devoid of feeling or emotion as non was intended (does that make sense? :D). I enjoy wildlife and so am drawing what I like (and why not?) while trying to learn a new area of art. I can see the argument that wildlife art is not high art, working from photos is not field work, painting is dead modern art has moved on etcetera. But I thought Duchamp put an end to this type of thinking with his urinal? To me there is room for all types of facets of art. Tim said I think this is great as it lets us get on with doing what we do regardless. To me it is about the quality of the work not the style and there is plenty of room for all. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Wildlife Art
The Devil is in the . . . . .
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top