What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Swarovski
The Future SV
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Chosun Juan" data-source="post: 3313603" data-attributes="member: 92780"><p><strong>Calling all Mavens !! <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" />)</strong></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Yes, this is why all top spec DSLR's still use optical viewfinders, although I believe that one day an economic, lightweight, fully digital bin will arrive, along with all the zoom, and exposure benefits, etc that confers, but that won't be for quite a while yet ..... the displays just aren't anywhere near there yet -- in terms of resolution, dynamic range, or lag response among others (and you guys think 'Rolling Ball' is bad! <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p>The last time we visited this subject a few years ago, I posted a then current, best prototype EVF module (4MP or thereabouts). Many years from now when they finally develop up to snuff (particularly the lag response {image pixel ghosting and artifacts upon movement}), then I will have to cross the bridge of do I really want my eyeballs bombarded by electrons and EMF? :eek!: ...... I think I will stick with photons thanks very much! :t:</p><p></p><p></p><p><strong><u>One for the Mavens</u>:</strong></p><p></p><p>Which brings me to the part about what are the limits of transmission with an optical device ???????? Given that we use the most incrementally beneficial HT and Ultra-FL glass, as well as yet to be fully developed unobtanium spec glass, how high can the transmission go ??????????</p><p></p><p>Say with PorroII prisms, and roughly 16 multicoated surfaces (of over 99.9% tr), then we should be up around 96.5% + transmission ..... is progress beyond that possible with upcoming technology on the drawing boards ?????? (increased transmission limits of multicoating, cold fusion, perfect surface finish vacuum joining, etc). Surely the brightness gains, and reduction in stray light is worth it ...... :cat: </p><p></p><p></p><p>Chosun :gh:</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Chosun Juan, post: 3313603, member: 92780"] [b]Calling all Mavens !! :))[/b] Yes, this is why all top spec DSLR's still use optical viewfinders, although I believe that one day an economic, lightweight, fully digital bin will arrive, along with all the zoom, and exposure benefits, etc that confers, but that won't be for quite a while yet ..... the displays just aren't anywhere near there yet -- in terms of resolution, dynamic range, or lag response among others (and you guys think 'Rolling Ball' is bad! :) The last time we visited this subject a few years ago, I posted a then current, best prototype EVF module (4MP or thereabouts). Many years from now when they finally develop up to snuff (particularly the lag response {image pixel ghosting and artifacts upon movement}), then I will have to cross the bridge of do I really want my eyeballs bombarded by electrons and EMF? :eek!: ...... I think I will stick with photons thanks very much! :t: [B][U]One for the Mavens[/U]:[/B] Which brings me to the part about what are the limits of transmission with an optical device ???????? Given that we use the most incrementally beneficial HT and Ultra-FL glass, as well as yet to be fully developed unobtanium spec glass, how high can the transmission go ?????????? Say with PorroII prisms, and roughly 16 multicoated surfaces (of over 99.9% tr), then we should be up around 96.5% + transmission ..... is progress beyond that possible with upcoming technology on the drawing boards ?????? (increased transmission limits of multicoating, cold fusion, perfect surface finish vacuum joining, etc). Surely the brightness gains, and reduction in stray light is worth it ...... :cat: Chosun :gh: [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Swarovski
The Future SV
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top