BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is absolutely FREE!

Register for an account to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Paul Chapman" data-source="post: 3247256" data-attributes="member: 69491">PeterI'll try and dig it out.I've watched various documentaries in the past. However, what I can assure you is that the system is generally stacked in favour of defendants who deny legitimate claims, a proper system to bring claims is a massively important factor in doing the regulators' jobs for them and larger claims depend on proving actual financial loss as levels of compensation for the injuries themselves are lower than where most members of the public would set them:-<a href="http://www.conscious.co.uk/site/library/pi/pi_jsb_guidelines_summary.html" target="_blank">http://www.conscious.co.uk/site/library/pi/pi_jsb_guidelines_summary.html</a>The cold-calling elements are not solicitors and indeed solicitors should have nothing to do with them:-<a href="http://www.sra.org.uk/documents/code/rule-7-publicity.pdf" target="_blank">http://www.sra.org.uk/documents/code/rule-7-publicity.pdf</a>Now moth trap....All the best</blockquote>