What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Birding
Information Wanted
The truth about magpies?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Alf King" data-source="post: 1405931" data-attributes="member: 22"><p>It could be argued, in fact, that "natural systems" as you define them, are so rare as to now be unnatural.</p><p></p><p>Semantics I know but some people (and I exclude you from this group) regard anything that comes under a human influence as not "natural". Does the action of a crow, for example, cease to be natural when it adopts tools to obtain food? Where is the cut-off between natural and unnatural.</p><p></p><p>Oh, and steady states have never existed for that long in the "natural" environment; there have always been natural phenomena coming along to screw things up.</p><p></p><p>==========================================================</p><p></p><p>In response to the question of how many birds cats/magpies kill - what would be the current position if these birds had survived? I think I know the rough approximation of the answer :t: .</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Alf King, post: 1405931, member: 22"] It could be argued, in fact, that "natural systems" as you define them, are so rare as to now be unnatural. Semantics I know but some people (and I exclude you from this group) regard anything that comes under a human influence as not "natural". Does the action of a crow, for example, cease to be natural when it adopts tools to obtain food? Where is the cut-off between natural and unnatural. Oh, and steady states have never existed for that long in the "natural" environment; there have always been natural phenomena coming along to screw things up. ========================================================== In response to the question of how many birds cats/magpies kill - what would be the current position if these birds had survived? I think I know the rough approximation of the answer :t: . [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Birding
Information Wanted
The truth about magpies?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top