What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
The Birdforum Digiscoping Forum
Digiscoping Cameras
The Ultimate digiscoping rig
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dale Forbes" data-source="post: 3249917" data-attributes="member: 65117"><p>Xayvian, if I understand you correctly, you are asking about ocular projection (no additional lenses between the camera sensor and the telescope's eyepiece) and afocal photography (=regular digiscoping, where some sort of camera objective lens is between the camera sensor and telescope's eyepiece).</p><p></p><p>Ocular projection kinda works to get some sort of image, but finding the optimal distance between the sensor and eyepiece is challenging to say the least and, even then, is likely to have high chromatic aberration and poor image quality in general (especially at the edge). It's not something I would recommend, except if you are desperate to get a photo and have no other option.</p><p></p><p>Regular digiscoping (be it with a camera objective or TLS APO) is really the route you want to go</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dale Forbes, post: 3249917, member: 65117"] Xayvian, if I understand you correctly, you are asking about ocular projection (no additional lenses between the camera sensor and the telescope's eyepiece) and afocal photography (=regular digiscoping, where some sort of camera objective lens is between the camera sensor and telescope's eyepiece). Ocular projection kinda works to get some sort of image, but finding the optimal distance between the sensor and eyepiece is challenging to say the least and, even then, is likely to have high chromatic aberration and poor image quality in general (especially at the edge). It's not something I would recommend, except if you are desperate to get a photo and have no other option. Regular digiscoping (be it with a camera objective or TLS APO) is really the route you want to go [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
The Birdforum Digiscoping Forum
Digiscoping Cameras
The Ultimate digiscoping rig
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top