What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Birding
Birds Of Prey
The Under Estimated Sparrowhawk
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="KnockerNorton" data-source="post: 1684995" data-attributes="member: 66452"><p>Not in Britain - Goshawks and Peregrines habitually hunt Sparrowhawks. On the Continent, Eagle Owls are the top avian predator (and here, where they're introduced).</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Indeed, but the implication is that if they have been predated, then they're not going to be there again. There were lots of Water Voles until Mink ate them.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Nobody is discounting 'human factors'. Indeed, they're at the root of it through habitat fragmentation, removal of top predators, and countless other interventions. But it's not really much use to say "I feel that x,y,z is more important", as Chriskten says. There is plenty of evidence out there that suggests that predation is quite important too. Another thing is that different factors change in importance at different times. So food is not an issue in spring, whereas predation can be (by taking breeding adults). Predation is probably not an issue in summer (lots of surplus juvs), whereas food can be (it soon runs out).</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>As some of the previous posts point out, this is true only to a point. In the Danish study, Sparrowhawks were dependent on Blackbirds but not Song Thrushes. Whereas Song Thrushes may have been very heavily dependent on Sparrowhawks (or a lack of them). The key thing to bear in mind is that predation pressure is not equal for all species, as not all species occur in the same numbers. Predation rates of 25% a year doesn't matter if your population is large, as there are still plenty left to breed and make good the losses. But if your population is small, and is under pressure from other areas too, then predation can be very important indeed. There are plenty of cases where this is obvious (predation at tern and wader colonies etc).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="KnockerNorton, post: 1684995, member: 66452"] Not in Britain - Goshawks and Peregrines habitually hunt Sparrowhawks. On the Continent, Eagle Owls are the top avian predator (and here, where they're introduced). Indeed, but the implication is that if they have been predated, then they're not going to be there again. There were lots of Water Voles until Mink ate them. Nobody is discounting 'human factors'. Indeed, they're at the root of it through habitat fragmentation, removal of top predators, and countless other interventions. But it's not really much use to say "I feel that x,y,z is more important", as Chriskten says. There is plenty of evidence out there that suggests that predation is quite important too. Another thing is that different factors change in importance at different times. So food is not an issue in spring, whereas predation can be (by taking breeding adults). Predation is probably not an issue in summer (lots of surplus juvs), whereas food can be (it soon runs out). As some of the previous posts point out, this is true only to a point. In the Danish study, Sparrowhawks were dependent on Blackbirds but not Song Thrushes. Whereas Song Thrushes may have been very heavily dependent on Sparrowhawks (or a lack of them). The key thing to bear in mind is that predation pressure is not equal for all species, as not all species occur in the same numbers. Predation rates of 25% a year doesn't matter if your population is large, as there are still plenty left to breed and make good the losses. But if your population is small, and is under pressure from other areas too, then predation can be very important indeed. There are plenty of cases where this is obvious (predation at tern and wader colonies etc). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Birding
Birds Of Prey
The Under Estimated Sparrowhawk
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top