What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Birding
Birds Of Prey
The Under Estimated Sparrowhawk
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="KnockerNorton" data-source="post: 1685183" data-attributes="member: 66452"><p>Nobody has mentioned culling anything, anywhere on this thread.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Indeed they did. And it is a fact that the populations of many passerines boomed during that time. Things like Tree Sparrows and Redpolls reached their population peak, and it's worth noting that when we judge population declines now, we're looking at a starting point of around 1965. At that time, most predators were at a minimum (not just Sparrowhawks). There were other factors at play too, as big landscape changes were underway that beneftted some species. But there was a near vacuum of predators around at that time. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I think you should check out who the authors of those studies are, and what the studies are part of. Google a few of the authors and see what else they have published, and I think you might change your perception. You are leaping to conclusions about why those studies were done. It is disingenuous to pass comment on their conclusions and even their motives when you have a lack of knowledge of them.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="KnockerNorton, post: 1685183, member: 66452"] Nobody has mentioned culling anything, anywhere on this thread. Indeed they did. And it is a fact that the populations of many passerines boomed during that time. Things like Tree Sparrows and Redpolls reached their population peak, and it's worth noting that when we judge population declines now, we're looking at a starting point of around 1965. At that time, most predators were at a minimum (not just Sparrowhawks). There were other factors at play too, as big landscape changes were underway that beneftted some species. But there was a near vacuum of predators around at that time. I think you should check out who the authors of those studies are, and what the studies are part of. Google a few of the authors and see what else they have published, and I think you might change your perception. You are leaping to conclusions about why those studies were done. It is disingenuous to pass comment on their conclusions and even their motives when you have a lack of knowledge of them. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Birding
Birds Of Prey
The Under Estimated Sparrowhawk
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top