What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Swarovski
Thoughts on the SLC WB?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="chill6x6" data-source="post: 3837189" data-attributes="member: 130888"><p>First....</p><p>I want to say....don't overthink this...LOL! The current model SLC 8X42 is among the best binoculars THERE IS! Seriously...let that sink in for a minute or two..</p><p></p><p>I have both the current SLC and the SLC HD. Optically, there isn't two cents difference that I can see. The current SLC focus IS a little slower but I wouldn't call it SLOW. Generally once you get used to the focus on a binocular it's almost a moot point for me(within reason). Going from about 25 feet to about 100yds(prob close to infinity)...the current SLC required about half a turn and both the SLC HD and the Monarch HG both took about 1/3 turn. Focus is smooth on all.</p><p></p><p>I weighed the SLC, the SLC HD, Meostar B.1 7X42, ALONG with the Monarch HG....all with nothing more than Rick Young UL harness snaps. As you know this meant removing the objective covers on the MHG and the Meostar:</p><p></p><p>SLC HD- 29.6 ounces</p><p>SLC- 28.1 ounces</p><p>MHG- 23.3 ounces</p><p>Meostar B.1- 32.2 ounces</p><p></p><p>it's easy to see why I like the MHG. Consider an SV 8X32 is about 22 ounces. The SV 32mm is the best in the ergonomics/weight/balance category. The SLCs are too bad though. They ARE compact binoculars for a 42mm so the weight sits in the palm of your hand. Very Leica UVHDish. So you are gonna gain about five ounces over the MHG. I absolutely don't think the weight of the SLC would interfere with anything whatsoever.</p><p></p><p>I think all the points you make are pretty much right on. The SLC is overall better optically except for FOV. I don't see any CA with it unless I go looking for it. The image is among the flattest...flatter than the MHG with a "field flattener." Diopter is super easy to adjust. </p><p></p><p>I don't see how one could go wrong with this binocular but I've been wrong before LOL! I feel like this is the BEST binocular at this price point and below.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="chill6x6, post: 3837189, member: 130888"] First.... I want to say....don't overthink this...LOL! The current model SLC 8X42 is among the best binoculars THERE IS! Seriously...let that sink in for a minute or two.. I have both the current SLC and the SLC HD. Optically, there isn't two cents difference that I can see. The current SLC focus IS a little slower but I wouldn't call it SLOW. Generally once you get used to the focus on a binocular it's almost a moot point for me(within reason). Going from about 25 feet to about 100yds(prob close to infinity)...the current SLC required about half a turn and both the SLC HD and the Monarch HG both took about 1/3 turn. Focus is smooth on all. I weighed the SLC, the SLC HD, Meostar B.1 7X42, ALONG with the Monarch HG....all with nothing more than Rick Young UL harness snaps. As you know this meant removing the objective covers on the MHG and the Meostar: SLC HD- 29.6 ounces SLC- 28.1 ounces MHG- 23.3 ounces Meostar B.1- 32.2 ounces it's easy to see why I like the MHG. Consider an SV 8X32 is about 22 ounces. The SV 32mm is the best in the ergonomics/weight/balance category. The SLCs are too bad though. They ARE compact binoculars for a 42mm so the weight sits in the palm of your hand. Very Leica UVHDish. So you are gonna gain about five ounces over the MHG. I absolutely don't think the weight of the SLC would interfere with anything whatsoever. I think all the points you make are pretty much right on. The SLC is overall better optically except for FOV. I don't see any CA with it unless I go looking for it. The image is among the flattest...flatter than the MHG with a "field flattener." Diopter is super easy to adjust. I don't see how one could go wrong with this binocular but I've been wrong before LOL! I feel like this is the BEST binocular at this price point and below. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Swarovski
Thoughts on the SLC WB?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top