What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Birding
Birds & Birding
Thoughts on ticking dead birds
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="fugl" data-source="post: 3627320" data-attributes="member: 816"><p>And your "rational rationale" for that statement is? What about birds that <em>happen</em> not-to-exist, should they be counted as well? (but enough, we're getting into exceedingly deep philosphical waters here. . .<img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" />) </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I believe you're mistaken about that, and that everybody here recognizes the arbitrariness of the rules. The reason why some "go on" the way they do is that they have strong feelings on the subject which they feel no need to justify "rationally" (and why the hell should they? "The heart", after all, "hath its reasons, which reason doth not know." <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" />).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="fugl, post: 3627320, member: 816"] And your "rational rationale" for that statement is? What about birds that [I]happen[/I] not-to-exist, should they be counted as well? (but enough, we're getting into exceedingly deep philosphical waters here. . .;)) I believe you're mistaken about that, and that everybody here recognizes the arbitrariness of the rules. The reason why some "go on" the way they do is that they have strong feelings on the subject which they feel no need to justify "rationally" (and why the hell should they? "The heart", after all, "hath its reasons, which reason doth not know." ;)). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Birding
Birds & Birding
Thoughts on ticking dead birds
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top