What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
Olympus
Thoughts on using the 50-200 SWD
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Tord" data-source="post: 2163498" data-attributes="member: 40738"><p>Hi,</p><p></p><p>AF: The rationale behind using all AF points is that I usually capture BIF against sky, unobstructed sight. I also agree the recommendation to use 1 AF point only when there is a background.</p><p></p><p>IS: I always use IS.1 and also monopod to the extent possible. </p><p></p><p>IS on or off has been a subject for many discussions I suppose. What I actually have done is to perform tests (using a method inspired from Wrotniak's setup) to find the benefit of IS and monopod on longest acceptable exposure time.</p><p>I used a E620 body with the 50-200SWD @ 200 mm and also the 70-300 @ 420 mm (with EC14). Target was static, outdoors @EV14, distance ~3/6 meters for full frame shots. Wrotniak advocates sequences of 20 pictures but I only took 10.</p><p></p><p>My findings are that, with the lenses above:</p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">The benefit of no IS vs IS.1 is somewhat less than 1 EV in favor of IS.1</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">The benefit of monopod is around 1.5 EV in favor of monopod</li> </ul><p></p><p>I have the graphs and data sheets on another computer. I can share with you if you are interested (I will have access to the said computer on Sat/Sun). </p><p></p><p>Above does not however provide answer to the question regarding required shutter speed for sharp pictures of BIF. I suppose a theoretical model and a sheet could be worked out with input parameters:</p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Motion speed of target</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Direction towards camera</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Photographer ability to track the subject</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Sharpness requirement (how many pixel deviation is acceptable)</li> </ul><p></p><p>And I realize we are now off-topic. Should we start a new thread?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>/Tord</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Tord, post: 2163498, member: 40738"] Hi, AF: The rationale behind using all AF points is that I usually capture BIF against sky, unobstructed sight. I also agree the recommendation to use 1 AF point only when there is a background. IS: I always use IS.1 and also monopod to the extent possible. IS on or off has been a subject for many discussions I suppose. What I actually have done is to perform tests (using a method inspired from Wrotniak's setup) to find the benefit of IS and monopod on longest acceptable exposure time. I used a E620 body with the 50-200SWD @ 200 mm and also the 70-300 @ 420 mm (with EC14). Target was static, outdoors @EV14, distance ~3/6 meters for full frame shots. Wrotniak advocates sequences of 20 pictures but I only took 10. My findings are that, with the lenses above: [LIST] [*]The benefit of no IS vs IS.1 is somewhat less than 1 EV in favor of IS.1 [*]The benefit of monopod is around 1.5 EV in favor of monopod [/LIST] I have the graphs and data sheets on another computer. I can share with you if you are interested (I will have access to the said computer on Sat/Sun). Above does not however provide answer to the question regarding required shutter speed for sharp pictures of BIF. I suppose a theoretical model and a sheet could be worked out with input parameters: [LIST] [*]Motion speed of target [*]Direction towards camera [*]Photographer ability to track the subject [*]Sharpness requirement (how many pixel deviation is acceptable) [/LIST] And I realize we are now off-topic. Should we start a new thread? /Tord [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Photography, Digiscoping & Art
Cameras And Photography
Olympus
Thoughts on using the 50-200 SWD
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top