Management Plan
Rich,
I think you, Kevin and everyone else are doing a great job - was great to hear about and see all the improvements made. It's improving every time I visit. Congrats to everyone. It's great to hear about all the birders visiting the site.
My first visit the the broad area was in c. 1996 to twitch a little egret! I cycled from college. (I didn't know about the ring-billed gull at Tongham GP on 2nd October 1996). Twitches for ring-necked duck (winter 2000/2001) and garganey to Tongham GP followed. My notes in 2002 from Tongham GP include ring ouzel, wood duck and ruddy duck - but it was the flock of golden plovers and wintering redshank (I think John Clark found these) that highlighted the site's potential. So from this early start to now is a great story (also highlights that Tongham GP also potential for scarce birds).
There is potentially a lot I could say - but perhaps it would be easier that I pop back at some point to discuss (perhaps over a beer!).
In general terms, the biodiversity action plan (BAP) you already have is a great start. The most important thing will be to get the management plan right and I am more than happy to help with this if needed. I suspect there are a few other people who could help too.
I also think it's important to accept that things change and as such the BAP and management plan should probably be reviewed on an annual basis on the back of evidence collected from animal and plant surveys. It might be a survey highlights the presence of an animal or plant of conservation interest and as such management may need to be tweaked to benefit them.
Have you thought of a bio-blitz day or days? I was hoping to pop back this spring / summer to survey for amphibians, reptiles, bats and grasshoppers.
Re records - do they also go to the Surrey Biological Records Centre, Surrey Amphibian and Reptile Group, Surrey bat group, etc etc? There may be development pressure in the future (particularly in the area of land between Tices and Tongham GP), and the records may save the site or ensure appropriate mitigation by developers. The SNCI status should stop the site being designated a SANG (suitable alternative natural green space) because the extra disturbance might adversely affect the breeding birds.
I also think the recreational value (to birders, local community, dog walkers, other natural history enthusiasts) and potential education value may need to be considered. If people value it - they are more likely to look after it.
A bioblitz day may highlight the site for invertebrate, plant, bat and other natural history enthusiasts - and perhaps a big sit in spring / autumn might attract other bird watchers to the site (would also be fun).
Anyway - how about we get together some time to discuss?
Dave
p.s. if the Tices birders fancy a foray into Kent for a day's birding let me know. Last year managed to find crane, great-white egret, rough-legged buzzard, continental coal tit and purple sandpiper (on a muddy pool) to name a few.