What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Birding
Birds & Birding
Tick criteria for you?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="kuzeycem" data-source="post: 3257049" data-attributes="member: 105360"><p>I don't tick birds on call. I'm not saying it's wrong, but I just don't do it. On the other hand, however, I don't have an obsession for seeing every single detail of the bird as well.</p><p>There are 2 things needed for a bird to make it's way to my life list: 1) I have to see it and 2) It has to be positively identified, either directly on the field, by a field guide back in home or by someone else.</p><p>I am a little compulsive about how good I see the bird and I usually don't settle with silhouettes hopping around in a bush or a flushed/fleeting bird. I mean, if it's all I've got, then I make my peace with it, add it to my list (although not very happily) and wait for better views. But in most of the cases I really want to see the bird good enough to see a diagnostic feature by myself, and not ticking something just because someone pointed at a meaningless silhouette and said "This is the x bird."</p><p>Although I do have some extreme cases, mostly for special birds, for example;</p><p>Last month we were birding and a sandgrouse flock flew by. I looked at them with binoculars and 2-3 birds I looked were Black-bellieds (I wanted Pin-tailed). Got a little disappointed but still decided to take a few pics in case there was a Pin-tailed mixed in. And there was one. I didn't see it "live" and ID it but the bird was there. And somehow I was satisfied with it as if I had just kept on looking with the binoculars I would probably have never noticed it. And I could just look at the bird from my camera screen, which I like to think as a binocular, although one that brings the image to you with a 5 sec. delay and stores it forever. I also saw the Pin-tailed alone for a moment about 30 minutes later but it was too distant and ID was made by my guide.</p><p>Another incident is when I was shown a Rough-legged Buzzard, I saw the diagnostic features myself but somehow now I don't remember exactly how I saw it, and it was only 3 years ago.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="kuzeycem, post: 3257049, member: 105360"] I don't tick birds on call. I'm not saying it's wrong, but I just don't do it. On the other hand, however, I don't have an obsession for seeing every single detail of the bird as well. There are 2 things needed for a bird to make it's way to my life list: 1) I have to see it and 2) It has to be positively identified, either directly on the field, by a field guide back in home or by someone else. I am a little compulsive about how good I see the bird and I usually don't settle with silhouettes hopping around in a bush or a flushed/fleeting bird. I mean, if it's all I've got, then I make my peace with it, add it to my list (although not very happily) and wait for better views. But in most of the cases I really want to see the bird good enough to see a diagnostic feature by myself, and not ticking something just because someone pointed at a meaningless silhouette and said "This is the x bird." Although I do have some extreme cases, mostly for special birds, for example; Last month we were birding and a sandgrouse flock flew by. I looked at them with binoculars and 2-3 birds I looked were Black-bellieds (I wanted Pin-tailed). Got a little disappointed but still decided to take a few pics in case there was a Pin-tailed mixed in. And there was one. I didn't see it "live" and ID it but the bird was there. And somehow I was satisfied with it as if I had just kept on looking with the binoculars I would probably have never noticed it. And I could just look at the bird from my camera screen, which I like to think as a binocular, although one that brings the image to you with a 5 sec. delay and stores it forever. I also saw the Pin-tailed alone for a moment about 30 minutes later but it was too distant and ID was made by my guide. Another incident is when I was shown a Rough-legged Buzzard, I saw the diagnostic features myself but somehow now I don't remember exactly how I saw it, and it was only 3 years ago. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Birding
Birds & Birding
Tick criteria for you?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top