What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Birding
Birds & Birding
to tick or not
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ColinD" data-source="post: 1586802" data-attributes="member: 55409"><p>As long as you can rule out House Martin, I'd tick it. The only other bird you need worry about is Storm Petrel. Did you notice any white on the underwing, did it have a pale bar on the upperwing? That would clinch it either way.</p><p></p><p>Lot's of birders tick things which they are not 100% certain about and don't even admit it to themselves. Most birders who visit Merseyside in September looking for Leach's Petrel, get a poor view of a small black bird with a white rump and tick it as Leach's. Yet so far this month there have been Leach's, Storm and even Wilson's in the Mersey / Dee. Yes I know that structually Leach's is quite different to the other two, but most ordinary birders don't even notice that. They've gone looking for Leach's, and when they see a black bird with a white rump, they tick it as Leach's. So how is your sighting any different?</p><p></p><p>The vast majority of ordinary birders tick birds on the balance of probability. They might be more certain of an identification than you are, but they're still not 100% certain.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ColinD, post: 1586802, member: 55409"] As long as you can rule out House Martin, I'd tick it. The only other bird you need worry about is Storm Petrel. Did you notice any white on the underwing, did it have a pale bar on the upperwing? That would clinch it either way. Lot's of birders tick things which they are not 100% certain about and don't even admit it to themselves. Most birders who visit Merseyside in September looking for Leach's Petrel, get a poor view of a small black bird with a white rump and tick it as Leach's. Yet so far this month there have been Leach's, Storm and even Wilson's in the Mersey / Dee. Yes I know that structually Leach's is quite different to the other two, but most ordinary birders don't even notice that. They've gone looking for Leach's, and when they see a black bird with a white rump, they tick it as Leach's. So how is your sighting any different? The vast majority of ordinary birders tick birds on the balance of probability. They might be more certain of an identification than you are, but they're still not 100% certain. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Birding
Birds & Birding
to tick or not
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top