What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Todays Quality
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="jan van daalen" data-source="post: 3670753" data-attributes="member: 113800"><p><a href="http://www.birdforum.net/images/smilies/awink.gif" target="_blank">http://www.birdforum.net/images/smilies/awink.gif</a></p><p>Dennis,</p><p></p><p>You wrote...."Maybe that is why we are seeing a decline of quality" and that is completely BS (IMHO)<img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /> .</p><p></p><p>The choice of the word "maybe" implies you can go both ways based on a post you are refurring to, which post is incorrect by the way. </p><p></p><p>There is no decline of quality. There is more transparancy because of Forums (or is it Fora:king<img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /> like this one where people can share their experiences. </p><p>That's why it could look for some of us like it is, but if you go from 1000 units in the 60s to 10.000 in 2018 the return will climb equally. This is something completly different than your insinuated "decline of quality".</p><p></p><p>Jan</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="jan van daalen, post: 3670753, member: 113800"] [url]http://www.birdforum.net/images/smilies/awink.gif[/url] Dennis, You wrote...."Maybe that is why we are seeing a decline of quality" and that is completely BS (IMHO);) . The choice of the word "maybe" implies you can go both ways based on a post you are refurring to, which post is incorrect by the way. There is no decline of quality. There is more transparancy because of Forums (or is it Fora:king:) like this one where people can share their experiences. That's why it could look for some of us like it is, but if you go from 1000 units in the 60s to 10.000 in 2018 the return will climb equally. This is something completly different than your insinuated "decline of quality". Jan [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Binoculars
Todays Quality
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top