tenex
reality-based
Can you post a serial number and maybe photo? Date of manufacture will matter, esp. due to coating improvements.what kind of advantages I'll be getting in going from the 8x32b to the HD model
Can you post a serial number and maybe photo? Date of manufacture will matter, esp. due to coating improvements.what kind of advantages I'll be getting in going from the 8x32b to the HD model
Doesn't it seem that from 40208 to 945731 would make mine from closer to the end of the run? That's a difference of 905523 and I would suspect that going from the 40,000 range to 945,000 should be enough to separate them by at least a decade if not more.Trinovid 8x32,
Production started in 1974 with serial number 40208.It is produced until 1990, so your sample seems from a few years after 1974.
Gijs van Ginkel
Doesn't it seem that from 40208 to 945731 would make mine from closer to the end of the run? That's a difference of 905523 and I would suspect that going from the 40,000 range to 945,000 should be enough to separate them by at least a decade if not more.
Thanks for coming up with the starting figure and maybe if someone knew what the final serial number range was could be even more helpful.
Did all three improvements happen with the introduction of the BA model then?I believe the 8x32b doesn't have phase correction, the latest coating system, or the same type of prisms. I imagine you'd be well satisfied with the improvement the HDs offer. If you were starting with a BA or BN model, not so much. (have owned: several 7x35bs, BAs, and BNs. still own 8x32 & 42 HD)
I don't know the answer to that question. But if you are going from the 8x32b to the HD model you would pick up the improvements I mentioned (and probably more...close focus???).Did all three improvements happen with the introduction of the BA model then?
Schmidt-Pechan prisms weren't an improvement over Uppendahl (arguably the reverse!) just more standard. But I believe that old-style Trinovids manufactured after 1988 should at least have phase coatings; that's how it worked with Zeiss Dialyts that became P*. (Someone here might even know the relevant serial numbers.) Leica was very proud of the BA model which they called Trinovid "Ultra" (later quietly dropped): diopter integrated with focuser, collapsible eyecups, waterproof... it really defined the modern binocular. BNs focused closer. Ultravids are lighter, and of course benefit from continued improvement of coatings. I could reach for any of these and be happy myself. Or if you like the original style, there are cute retro Trinovid models with modern glass at Leica shops as well, highly regarded by some here (search for "Retrovid").Did all three improvements happen with the introduction of the BA model then?
I just got my first decent binoculars (Trinovid 8x32b) and have instantly regretted not getting them years ago. Every time I use them it becomes more obvious how they carry none of the frustrations I've seen with far too many binoculars over the years and every time that I've used something in the past that seemed impressive, they also turned out to be far too expensive for my needs.
Now that I've got them though, I keep thinking of the Ultravid or Trinovid HD and your review is exactly what I needed to see. Not only did you compare the two models I've been considering, you also seem to go much further into realms of detail than my novice eye is able to detect.
One thing I'd still like to find more information on though, which seems to be all but lacking in my searches so far, is a comparison to find out how much, and what kind of advantages I'll be getting in going from the 8x32b to the HD model...
I'm really happy with these so far because I've never had a 'need' for any binoculars really, other than when out on salt water for days at a time, and the boat already had some 7x35's of some sort that seemed to work well enough in low light and everything else. Too bulky for me to get interested in though, except for as a bridge tool....classic Leitz Trinovids do certain things exceptionally well. Their handling and form factor is still outstanding today, and the mechanical excellence that was one of their hallmarks very much evident in the ones I've handled. The binoculars of the 1950s-60s era are often praised for the quality of their workmanship compared to many modern offerings, and the Leitzes I've seen are amongst the very best in that respect. There is a pleasure in handling and operating something so beautifully put together that is part of the reason why the best of that generation of binoculars are still valued today.
Does the Trinovid HD 8x42 qualify as a compact enough package for you? 5.5" x 4.6" x 2.6"I'd really like to have something else in the same type of high quality, compact package that is so easy to look through, but also works better in lower light situations.
There's a pretty big difference optically between a binocular of that era and a modern unit. There have been major advances in coatings and glass technology in the intervening decades, not just phase coating but also advanced multicoatings, anti-reflection coatings, dielectric coatings on roof prism mirrors. The workmanship and mechanical quality of those old Trinnies is unsurpassed, but a modern high-end optic will have a noticeably brighter, sharper, clearer view, in addition to the field niceties like waterproofness and improved close focus.I just got my first decent binoculars (Trinovid 8x32b) and have instantly regretted not getting them years ago. Every time I use them it becomes more obvious how they carry none of the frustrations I've seen with far too many binoculars over the years and every time that I've used something in the past that seemed impressive, they also turned out to be far too expensive for my needs.
Now that I've got them though, I keep thinking of the Ultravid or Trinovid HD and your review is exactly what I needed to see. Not only did you compare the two models I've been considering, you also seem to go much further into realms of detail than my novice eye is able to detect.
One thing I'd still like to find more information on though, which seems to be all but lacking in my searches so far, is a comparison to find out how much, and what kind of advantages I'll be getting in going from the 8x32b to the HD model. Hopefully someone out there will have had both models and I also suspect that the older model will end up being the car binocular, or vice versa when I do buy an upgrade.