What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Spotting Scopes & tripod/heads
Tripod and Heads
Tripod head for Scope
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="mayoayo" data-source="post: 3325579" data-attributes="member: 16781"><p>Roy,..the celestron is very nice..i have owned the regal 65 and i can also praise its optics,specially when compared with other budget scopes and considering its low price and eyepuece compatibility...i think it is a bargain,and do not falls far behind the top brands..but the top modeld you are mentioning,the 883 and the Atx series,are a step ,or two above..I only tested the 883 once,and not for long,but i was able to detect level of performance i would say "superior",probably due to the larger objective ..i would say it was the best view i ever experienced,..untul i tested the Atx85 a few weeks ago...contrast and detail that surpassed my kowa 823 by a good stretch..the owner of the scope,perhaps trying to be nice,commented on how close the views were.For me ,the advantage in performance was very clear..I have read a few of your comments about lenses and i have seen very good pictures you took with your starwatcher 85 and i know you are very exigent and aim for excellence..I think if you try the swaro Atx you probably wouldn't accept a lesser view..also ,its photographic potential,via digiscoping,is going to be higher...</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="mayoayo, post: 3325579, member: 16781"] Roy,..the celestron is very nice..i have owned the regal 65 and i can also praise its optics,specially when compared with other budget scopes and considering its low price and eyepuece compatibility...i think it is a bargain,and do not falls far behind the top brands..but the top modeld you are mentioning,the 883 and the Atx series,are a step ,or two above..I only tested the 883 once,and not for long,but i was able to detect level of performance i would say "superior",probably due to the larger objective ..i would say it was the best view i ever experienced,..untul i tested the Atx85 a few weeks ago...contrast and detail that surpassed my kowa 823 by a good stretch..the owner of the scope,perhaps trying to be nice,commented on how close the views were.For me ,the advantage in performance was very clear..I have read a few of your comments about lenses and i have seen very good pictures you took with your starwatcher 85 and i know you are very exigent and aim for excellence..I think if you try the swaro Atx you probably wouldn't accept a lesser view..also ,its photographic potential,via digiscoping,is going to be higher... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Binoculars & Spotting Scopes
Spotting Scopes & tripod/heads
Tripod and Heads
Tripod head for Scope
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top