What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
New review items
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
Search forums
Gallery
New media
New comments
Search media
Reviews
New items
Latest content
Latest reviews
Latest questions
Brands
Search reviews
Opus
Birds & Bird Song
Locations
Resources
Contribute
Recent changes
Blogs
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
ZEISS
ZEISS Nature Observation
The Most Important Optical Parameters
Innovative Technologies
Conservation Projects
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
BirdForum is the net's largest birding community dedicated to wild birds and birding, and is
absolutely FREE
!
Register for an account
to take part in lively discussions in the forum, post your pictures in the gallery and more.
Forums
Birding
Sea Watch
Ultimate Pelagics Biscay 2008
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Hugh Harrop" data-source="post: 1275233" data-attributes="member: 4703"><p>Given the UP concept, I would doubt that we (on a fixed line transect with maybe 60 observers onboard, 25 - 30 of whom (COW clients) are primarily looking for cetaceans (thus there is very little telescope scanning and an awful lot of naked eye scanning so many birds will be missed)) could match what UP are reporting but it would help if we know what they saw in the first place! Obviously you'd have to factor in so many variables and base on available hours at sea which on the UP trip I estimate at 65. On a COW trip we would average 21 hours of at sea survey time - for the rest of the time at sea in unproductive waters our guides give illutrated talks and lectures etc etc).</p><p></p><p>I do not need compare to numbers to prove our worth -a classic example being the numbers of Cory's on one of our trips last week. We (as a business) recorded 250-ish and this was our published final figure. But the hardcore of Cardiff Bird Club who seawatched on the boat pretty much from dawn to dusk recorded over a 1000 and also had 3 Little Shears and quite a few more Greats and Sooties than us.</p><p></p><p>Cheers</p><p></p><p>HH</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Hugh Harrop, post: 1275233, member: 4703"] Given the UP concept, I would doubt that we (on a fixed line transect with maybe 60 observers onboard, 25 - 30 of whom (COW clients) are primarily looking for cetaceans (thus there is very little telescope scanning and an awful lot of naked eye scanning so many birds will be missed)) could match what UP are reporting but it would help if we know what they saw in the first place! Obviously you'd have to factor in so many variables and base on available hours at sea which on the UP trip I estimate at 65. On a COW trip we would average 21 hours of at sea survey time - for the rest of the time at sea in unproductive waters our guides give illutrated talks and lectures etc etc). I do not need compare to numbers to prove our worth -a classic example being the numbers of Cory's on one of our trips last week. We (as a business) recorded 250-ish and this was our published final figure. But the hardcore of Cardiff Bird Club who seawatched on the boat pretty much from dawn to dusk recorded over a 1000 and also had 3 Little Shears and quite a few more Greats and Sooties than us. Cheers HH [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes...
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Birding
Sea Watch
Ultimate Pelagics Biscay 2008
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more...
Top